Please don't cross post - it makes it very hard trying to help you.
There have been a number of suggestions made on your original thread (
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89675 ) and you have not
answered them.
Stick to the original thread.
--
bpa
erland;647699 Wrote:
Could you give some examples ?
I'm just asking because I'm seriously interested to hear why people
select Squeezebox over Sonos, if you compare their specifications they
are fairly similar and everyone more or less knows that Sonos just
works while it usually takes a
Sorry about that.. indeed I am completely delirious, I didn't intend to
double-post. It's been an interesting week, I'll leave it at that :)
--
ManChicken
ManChicken's Profile:
autopilot;651003 Wrote:
For me...
1. Cost.
2. A portable battery powered option for the garden etc.
3. The third party BBC iplayer plugin
4. Having a screen on the players.
5. Being able to use an IR remote as well (made posible by point 3).
4. 5. for me are very important and often
SilverRS8;650992 Wrote:
Spotify is 320kbps. The highest compressed quality. I believe
information of the stream is accessible by the 'more info' menu.
I've got Spotify and think its great.
However not all tracks are at 320kbps, there are a couple of blogs on
the web about it, I do notice a
HeadBanger;650786 Wrote:
In the UK the rrp has been confirmed as as £549 for RoomPlayer I and
£499 for RoomPlayer II. Not cheap! It is expected to launch September
or October.
Well a bit early to comment on the price when its not known what
quality fx the dac has. I also like that you use a
When I stream music via VLC and switch on the MSN Now playing option,
Messenger only picks up the Welcome to Squeezebox server message that
obviously and for qurious reasons comes with the stream.
In the VLC configuration of metadata artist and title are displayed
together and correctly in the
michaeldk;651026 Wrote:
Well a bit early to comment on the price when its not known what quality
fx the dac has.
Yes, fair point. I've been keeping an eye on these since they were
first announced as a possible Duet / Receiver repacement. Ideally, I
would have preferred a DAC-less version too
HeadBanger;651036 Wrote:
Yes, fair point. I've been keeping an eye on these since they were first
announced as a possible Duet / Receiver repacement. Ideally, I would
have preferred a DAC-less version too at a much lower price.
One snag for me is how their software handles the artwork. If
bluegaspode;649211 Wrote:
Hi lawesson.
From a technical point of view, there should be no problem with using
dynamic playlists.
SqueezePlayer just plays what it's told to play by the server - and the
server completely supports the Dynamic Playlists if they work on other
Squeezeboxes
Running SBS and MusicIP on a windows box? Having problems?
Go install the nightly build (33110 or later)
Michael figured it out and fixed it!
Not only is the odd behavior gone, but it's loads faster.
Thanks Michael!
--
bobkoure
amcluesent;647759 Wrote:
But, yep, the Duet Receiver was a lemon.
?
How so ?
The Duet has been a fantastic investment for me.
Horses for courses I guess shrug
--
swayzak
swayzak's Profile:
A -lot- of the MusicIP issues on Windows were indeed related to
case-mismatched volume letters.
If you're running SBS in a win box it's worth upgrading to the nightly
(33110 or later). Even if the sugarcube problem is unrelated, you'll
have at least removed that complication.
--
bobkoure
vrette;650985 Wrote:
...Touch power supply directly from Logitech. It is a perfect
replacement, and a better unit.
Interesting... How do you know it's a better unit? Put both on a scope?
Are they both switching power supplies?
I've read that there's some issue with the original SB3 ps putting
bobkoure;651061 Wrote:
Interesting... How do you know it's a better unit? Put both on a scope?
Are they both switching power supplies?
I've read that there's some issue with the original SB3 ps putting
interference on the inbound AC line. Is the touch ps just cleaner that
way?
That is what
i've used ir blaster for some time and have update SB Server to 7.6.1 RC3. I
use the wifi controller to control a duet reciever and 2 SB Classics. both
SB Classics are setup with IR Blaster.
No problem with IR Blaster from the Web Interface or the SB Classic regular
remote. But the Duet
bobkoure;651059 Wrote:
A -lot- of the MusicIP issues on Windows were indeed related to
case-mismatched volume letters.
If you're running SBS in a win box it's worth upgrading to the nightly
(33110 or later). Even if the sugarcube problem is unrelated, you'll
have at least removed that
Allright, did my homework and figured out I should change the icy-name
settings, suppousedly in the HTTP.pm-file but as far as I can see that
one doesn't have those lines. Where shall I look?
--
lawesson
lawesson's
My 2 penneth...
Been a SB fan for 3+ years. I can't recall what lead me to SB or indeed
why I wanted to listen to streamed music. I remember, I think seeing the
Roku soundbridge and thinking it would be cool but on further research
serendipity brought me to the SB system.
I have SB3, two booms
Ok, did some further googling and found the accurate HTTP.pm file with
the icy-name line. Commented it out and restarted the server. But -
gah! - VLC still displays the title-info. No longer the Welcome-message
but the stream URL.
Suppose this is a quirky way of communication between the server
I'm not using Dynamic Playlists so cannot comment on SqueezeCommanders
ability to handle them.
You might try the Logitech Controller App (if its running on your
phone) just as a comparison if it handles those menus better.
--
bluegaspode
Did you know: *'SqueezePlayer'
Ir blaster hasn't worked properly for awhile . Some people may not have
problems but without
Any ir updates this 3rd party plugin appears to be dead in the water .
--
jhonsber...@msn.com
jhonsber...@msn.com's Profile:
22 matches
Mail list logo
