pippin wrote:
> Mine were pretty early ones and Logitech was well aware of the problem
> (during the beta I sent another one back and the replacements were
> originally more silent and only later developed the noise).
> Im not sure whether i remember this correctly but the problem might
> also
Mine were pretty early ones and Logitech was well aware of the problem
(during the beta I sent another one back and the replacements were
originally more silent and only later developed the noise).
Im not sure whether i remember this correctly but the problem might
also have been specific to
pippin wrote:
> Hm... while I actually agree on the Sbooster and for the life of me I
> would not let that device near any of my power outlets (having once seen
> the interior of one, that device was seriously dangerous)... and no, I
> also dont believe linear power supplies improve anything ...
Hm... while I actually agree on the Sbooster and for the life of me I
would not let that device near any of my power outlets (having once seen
the interior of one, that device was seriously dangerous)... and no, I
also dont believe linear power supplies improve anything ...
But the power supply
garym wrote:
> You're asking the wrong person. I believe in science and engineering and
> facts. things like Sbooster are audiophool nonsense. the only thing
> they do better is separate you from your money. There's all kinds of
> technical reasons that a linear power supply won't improve the
celo wrote:
> Thanks Gary.
>
> Let me ask this. Last night my wife and I did a blind test running the
> SBT via power bank and stock AC adapter.
>
> Both times we liked the AC adapter better. Everything was more open and
> real sounding vs. the battery power. Then I thought, maybe an AC
garym wrote:
> short answer. no. Keep the SB Touch.
Thanks Gary.
Let me ask this. Last night my wife and I did a blind test running the
SBT via power bank and stock AC adapter.
Both times we liked the AC adapter better. Everything was more open and
real sounding vs. the battery power. Then I
celo wrote:
> I have been using SBT for few years and have no issues. I use it
> strictly as a streamer since I have an external DAC. LMS is running via
> RPi3.
>
> I just came across a used Aires Mini with Sbooster. I will pay double
> what I paid for the SBT and if I sell my SBT, my cost will
I have been using SBT for few years and have no issues. I use it
strictly as a streamer since I have an external DAC. LMS is running via
RPi3.
I just came across a used Aires Mini with Sbooster. I will pay double
what I paid for the SBT and if I sell my SBT, my cost will be around
$300 just
I think keep this thread to the use of Net::UDAP - otherwise this
digression will fill it.
bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806
View this thread:
The word "better" is absolute and needs to be based on a measurable
quantity. Truth is it sounds "different", maybe, but not "better".
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450
Pi3 with pcp and hifiberry dac sounds even better (clearer) as touch,
both wired. Perhaps lucky, I don't now.
*SqueezeBoxes:* 2x SB2 (Living room and study), 1x Radio (Kitchen), 1x
Boom (Dining room), 1x piCorePlayer (jacuzzi), 1x piCorePlayer (Garden)
1x OSMC + Squeezelite (Movie room), 1x
I truly fear for humanity.
alfista's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32396
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57861
___
My Nas is RopsberryPi with battery powerbank, I have found it is serves
me better than qnap storage in determination of SQ. HIFI system has to
be very very good in order to hear audible differences. But, as someone
suggest it is for another thread.
check this:
petarst wrote:
> It seems my plan has failed, i knew that router will create some noise
> and i want to eliminate it
That's just nonsense.
There's nothing to suggest that noise carried on the ethernet cable
under normal circumstances will affect audio performance.
Even so, why would a switch
According to the hardware specs (
https://web.archive.org/web/20090221124647/http://slimdevices.com:80/pi_receiver.html
) , the SB has auto receiver polarity detection - this has been reported
as auto MDIX which was a HP specific term. I think SB receiver can auto
detect direct vs crossover
Mnyb wrote:
> Or use a switch ? That conects both NAS and the reciever to your network
> ?
>
> How else is LMS on the NAS suposed to see the rest of the network ?
>
> As you want to use net::udap you set up a reciever without the controler
> .
> The controller can do an ad-hoc connection
Or use a switch ? That conects both NAS and the reciever to your network
?
How else is LMS on the NAS suposed to see the rest of the network ?
As you want to use net::udap you set up a reciever without the controler
.
The controller can do an ad-hoc connection directly to the reciever with
some
Thx mate, so it means i need to get crossover cable, right?
BR/Petar
petarst's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66289
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57861
If the NAS has a gigabit port it should autodetect crossover. But the
Receiver won't it's only 100Mb.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than
Bravo, thank you very much !
Does anyone knows if i can connect directly receiver and my NAS without
crossover cable if the port is auto sensitive?
petarst's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66289
21 matches
Mail list logo
