Mnyb;673107 Wrote:
to work, a pulic service TV should operate under it's own charter and
not under controll by the goverment, you see when it go wrong just tune
in the weird channels on your cable TV.
men with mustach and khaki uniforms reading the news :)
The BBC is changing, ex Tory
DaveWr;673133 Wrote:
The BBC is changing, ex Tory party chairman heads it up. Budget frozen
for 6 years. We Brits like to wreck what we have.
Don't worry, the right wing Aussies politicians try the same thing with
the ABC. It's a constant battle :(.
--
Gingernut63
Gingernut63
Gingernut63;673064 Wrote:
The ABC in Australia is very similar to the BBC; it provides the quality
I look for in TV programs, some sourced from the BBC. The ABC while
funded by Government, has it's own charter and operates independently.
Without the ABC providing a quality alternative then
toby10;673059 Wrote:
Good god! Our government in the TV/entertainment business? No thanks.
;)Spare a thought for the poor Italians. They have had to put up with
BBC (Berlusconi Brodcasting Corporation) for decades...
--
AndrewFG
Regards,
AndrewFG
Try out Whitebear. The middleware that
This is very interesting discussion.
I guess the real thread for average user comes from external
complexity
Any mass-market solution should be easy to set-up and operate by one
fingertip.
Interestingly TV solution rivals are: Samsung with its HUB, Philips
with similar ideas and of course
AndreE;673021 Wrote:
Who needs a standard TV when you can stream everything from internet
using one of HUBX or possible iTune?.
Once the content owners (networks, broadcasters) see their revenues
slipping they will stop allowing internet broadcasting, some already do
this.
Or
toby10;673026 Wrote:
Once the content owners (networks, broadcasters) see their revenues
slipping they will stop allowing internet broadcasting, some already do
this.
Or they will start charging for internet broadcasting, effectively
swapping cable/sat services for internet services.
Mnyb;673031 Wrote:
that is all and well as it should be, but the content providers and
content owners are just as confused as the music industry on how to
provide for the user it all a big mess rigth now.
Nobody is going to give consummers the absolute flexibility to shedule
and
castalla;673034 Wrote:
BBC manage without subscription - a yearly licence fee is sufficient -
and results in the best radio and TV in the world. Subscription tv is
a curse.
They do get some £ by selling those shows to other networks... or you
could pay to get BBC (I can with my cable
Mnyb;673031 Wrote:
don't forget that the big money in TV comes from the comercials nobody
would afford TV if it where all paid by the subscription , thats a
fraction of the costs involved. So the TV exist to expose you to
comercials, your favorite TV show is a tool to have you sitting
castalla;673034 Wrote:
BBC manage without subscription - a yearly licence fee is sufficient -
and results in the best radio and TV in the world. Subscription tv is
a curse.
we do pay quite some money in Germany on monthly basis - i still
question some content produced for it
some are very
Mnyb;673036 Wrote:
castalla;673034 Wrote:
BBC manage without subscription - a yearly licence fee is sufficient -
and results in the best radio and TV in the world. Subscription tv is
a curse.
They do get some £ by selling those shows to other networks... or you
could pay to get
Good god! Our government in the TV/entertainment business? No thanks.
;)
--
toby10
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread:
toby10;673059 Wrote:
Good god! Our government in the TV/entertainment business? No thanks.
;)
The ABC in Australia is very similar to the BBC; it provides the
quality I look for in TV programs, some sourced from the BBC. The ABC
while funded by Government, has it's own charter and operates
to work, a pulic service TV should operate under it's own charter and
not under controll by the goverment, you see when it go wrong just tune
in the weird channels on your cable TV.
men with mustach and khaki uniforms reading the news :)
--
Mnyb
toby10;672016 Wrote:
Yeah, but most of his stuff is like the Partridge Family, David Soul,
the Osmonds, Kiki Di, the Carpenters, etc ;)
What's wrong with Kiki Dee and the Carpenters? (if you want to hear
great songwriting, production and arrangement, listen to the Carpenters
-
mherger;672063 Wrote:
Well, I think Logitech are still thinking about doing *something* with
Squeezebox. They emailed me today with a massive survey all around
SB
that I duly filled out for them. It was huge and took ages. Hope
they
appreciate it!
Interesting! Can you send me a
Phil Leigh;672090 Wrote:
What's wrong with Kiki Dee and the Carpenters? (if you want to hear
great songwriting, production and arrangement, listen to the Carpenters
- seriously)
Kiki Dee's first 2 albums on Rocket are both great too.
Now if you want to hear an arrangement bordering on
toby10;672105 Wrote:
Now if you want to hear an arrangement bordering on heavenly I'd
suggest:
The original pressing (as pictured) of this album is legendary - only 1
copy is known to exist and has been lodged for safekeeping in the
Vatican vaults, but the recent remaster fell victim to the
spooky photo ... are they aliens?
--
castalla
1 Touch - Muse M50 EX TPA3123 T-Amp Mini - Acoustics Q10 speakers - 2
duff ears - purrfekt!
castalla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15624
Ha! I get a chuckle every time I see that album cover. Just too funny.
:)
I do enjoy Karen Carpenter. Now Kiki I am not familiar with other than
her duet with Elton (and I'd prefer not hearing that one again).
--
toby10
castalla;671693 Wrote:
I suspect they are aimed at different consumers. The Brennan is also
advertised in the UK daily press and Private Eye (!). A more direct
competitor is the Cockail Audio x10.
Neither can do what, say, what the Touch can do - and neither are as
flexible as players.
oktup;672144 Wrote:
Happened to notice the latest issue of What Hi Fi on the shelf
recently while doing my grocery shopping (ahem). Front page and main
feature was The Top 10 Ways To Stream Your Music (best models for
audiophiles, the best on a budget, best for user-friendliness, etc).
Not
They cover the 299 pound range upwards - there's nothing avalable from
Logitech at those inflated prices.
--
castalla
1 Touch - Muse M50 EX TPA3123 T-Amp Mini - Acoustics Q10 speakers - 2
duff ears - purrfekt!
castalla's
I would have liked to be on the survey, shame it couldn't be opened to
forum members!
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
--
socistep
socistep's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18860
View
castalla;672150 Wrote:
They cover the 299 pound range upwards - there's nothing avalable from
Logitech at those inflated prices.
But one of the categories was best on a budget, IIRC! It would seem
incredibly strange if they had set an arbitrary £299 *minimum* limit
for a budget category. Or
It would also be very interesting to see how many of the ten tested
units are from companies that advertise in their publication. ;)
--
toby10
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View
toby10;672174 Wrote:
It would also be very interesting to see how many of the ten tested
units are from companies that advertise in their publication. ;)
True.
And did they do a blind test like the streamer test in HiFi Choise
magazine?
--
Pascal Hibon
2 x SB3, 1 x SB Boom and 1 x SB
toby10;672174 Wrote:
It would also be very interesting to see how many of the ten tested
units are from companies that advertise in their publication. ;)
Ah, you are aware of What HiFi? then :D
--
browellm
Modwright Transporter Kondo M7 LV Argento Avantgarde Uno Nano
browellm;672037 Wrote:
Well, I think Logitech are still thinking about doing *something* with
Squeezebox. They emailed me today with a massive survey all around SB
that I duly filled out for them. It was huge and took ages. Hope they
appreciate it!
Interesting indeed. I filled it in and
What do music consumers without an interest in geeky / techy solutions
want from a music system these days?
In order of importance as I see it:
1. The ability to play music from their iPod (unfortunately I think it
will be necessary to concede Apple's dominance here)
2. A portable solution
funkstar;672217 Wrote:
Interesting indeed. I filled it in and only got about three questions.
They either didn't like that I was in the UK, or they didn't like the
career choices for myself, my family or my close friends.
I'm UK too. I agree that some of the questions are response driven
browellm;672247 Wrote:
I was miffed that the Transporter wasn't one of the options in the What
Hardware do you own? question :-/
Yes, I know. It's as though they're only interested in plastic
products these days. A real shame.
--
paulster
Receiver stuck at blue LED state after reboot?
browellm;672198 Wrote:
Ah, you are aware of What HiFi? then :D
Never heard of it till the post in this thread. Just a hunch. ;)
--
toby10
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View
Gingernut63;671845 Wrote:
The multiple ways of accessing music in LMS must remain. To quote Devo
Freedom of choice is what you got, freedom of choice!, is what you
want! :)...
I hear ya bud, I hear ya. :)
Recent posting of a new enthusiastic SB user just discovering a music
service
toby. I use both myself, my rather smallish music library of a few thousand
songs and then I utilize several services for my enjoyment.:)[/QUOTE Wrote:
I used to think my collection of 400 odd cd's was quite a reasonable
collection until I read garym's posts!!
Trev
--
gruntwolla;672011 Wrote:
I used to think my collection of 400 odd cd's was quite a reasonable
collection until I read garym's posts!!
Trev
;-) It's an illness (according to my wife). He doesn't post here
anymore, but search the Forum for the user iPHONE. His collection
makes mine look
gruntwolla;672011 Wrote:
I used to think my collection of 400 odd cd's was quite a reasonable
collection until I read garym's posts!!
Trev
Yeah, but most of his stuff is like the Partridge Family, David Soul,
the Osmonds, Kiki Di, the Carpenters, etc ;)
--
toby10
toby10;672016 Wrote:
Yeah, but most of his stuff is like the Partridge Family, David Soul,
the Osmonds, Kiki Di, the Carpenters, etc ;)
Lol. I USED to own a Carpenter's cd. Unfortunately it got destroyed
in a fire before I had a chance to rip it.
Trev
--
gruntwolla
Debian sheeva
I draw the line at David Soul. ;-)
--
garym
Location 1: Vortexbox Appliance 6TB (1.10) SbS 7.6.2 Transporter,
Touch, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
Location 2: Win7(64) laptop LMS 7.7.0 TouchBenchmark DAC I, Boom,
Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio and laptop)
Well, I think Logitech are still thinking about doing *something* with
Squeezebox. They emailed me today with a massive survey all around SB
that I duly filled out for them. It was huge and took ages. Hope they
appreciate it!
--
browellm
Modwright Transporter Kondo M7 Red Wine Signature
Well, I think Logitech are still thinking about doing *something* with
Squeezebox. They emailed me today with a massive survey all around SB
that I duly filled out for them. It was huge and took ages. Hope they
appreciate it!
Interesting! Can you send me a copy of the questionnaire?
I got one a few weeks ago and then was invited to participate in a focus
group, which I was genuinely excited about as it was a perfect
opportunity to give some real world feedback on the Squeezebox
products.
I waited in and they didn't show up. :-(
Turned out they decided they didn't need
he he do they invite the usual suspects :) are not they a predictable
bunch.
But it is much better than a random choice at the busstop help what
is this it's not an iPod
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J
Mnyb;672069 Wrote:
he he do they invite the usual suspects :) are not they a predictable
bunch.
It was the day after I'd registered a new product on the website (to
make sure I got any promo offers) that I got the survey sent to me, so
I guess it was probably more to do with that than the
Gingernut63;671680 Wrote:
The internet is a communication system, what happens if it falls over
or someone cuts through a cable etc... How can you access the music
then?
..
Very true and it doesn't even need to be physical cable cut. Services
come and go based on business
Gingernut63;671680 Wrote:
.. I like to have ownership and control over the music I listen too.
I would however like to access a streaming music service for a short
time just to see what all the fuss is about. Indeed I have a friend who
is mad keen for me to try it but as previously
toby10;671764 Wrote:
I'm sure there might be a small segment of the streaming population that
rely exclusively on services and own no music of their own. But I'd bet
the vast majority of service users also have a music collection of
varying degrees. I use both myself, my rather smallish
I do not know if it's wise to last only on streaming services. Some
people are not happy when they read messages like the following
http://www.stholdings.co.uk/2011/11/16/removal-of-content-from-spotify-simfy-rdio-napster/
--
jo-wie
2 * Classic, 2 * Boom, SC 7.6.2 auf GigaByte STA/C mit VIA
Quoted from the posted link :
'As a distributor we have to do what is best for our labels. The
majority of which do not want their music on such services. They
provide poor revenue and have a detrimental affect on sales. Add to
that, the feeling that their music loses its specialness by its
jo-wie;671786 Wrote:
I do not know if it's wise to last only on streaming services. Some
people are not happy when they read messages like the following
http://www.stholdings.co.uk/2011/11/16/removal-of-content-from-spotify-simfy-rdio-napster/
Yes availability can change, also some albums
Weird music world, I can stream Adele 21 on Napster.
--
jo-wie
2 * Classic, 2 * Boom, SC 7.6.2 auf GigaByte STA/C mit VIA C7 1GHz, 1GB
RAM, 250 GB 2,5 HD, Ubuntu Desktop 8.04 LTS, CD - FLAC = dbpoweramp,
Mix MusicIP, Router AVM Fritz 3270
last.fm/user/jo-wie
toby10;671762 Wrote:
Very true and it doesn't even need to be physical cable cut. Services
come and go based on business decisions like Napster ending services in
Canada next month.
But I also think it is silly to worry about such things if you
genuinely have an interest in using such
toby10;671764 Wrote:
I'm sure there might be a small segment of the streaming population that
rely exclusively on services and own no music of their own. But I'd bet
the vast majority of service users also have a music collection of
varying degrees. I use both myself, my rather smallish
erland;671554 Wrote:
If you ask me, this was a very positive message, because it shows that:
1. Logitech is aware that they need to focus on the user experience to
make the products a success, something they haven't done during the
last years with all the technical non music and non user
You can, of course, hope that this guy is so far removed from the users,
developers and marketing department that he has no clue what he's
talking about and they'll be left to get on making it the product it
should be.
But that's always assuming that marketing have any clue, since they
Mnyb;671565 Wrote:
I was not convinced about point 4 the rest I agree .
If local playback gets really small compared to streaming it might be
seen as just a cost and deleted.
But on the other hand there is no big difference from the current
situation with very slow unguided development .
I'm not sure I understand why Logitech would want to concentrate on
Internet radio. In the UK that market is well catered for with several
models from the established radio manufacturers. Most have DAB, and/or
FM radios built in as well. Some have CD players or iPod docks. The
Logitech Radio,
paulster;671566 Wrote:
But that's always assuming that marketing have any clue, since they
unfortunately tend to lead product development these days. :-(
Don't you mean marketing and accounting?
I think Logitech started well improving on the Slim Server ideas but
over time they have lost
Gingernut63;671576 Wrote:
Anyway as castalla has stated, while the hardware still functions we
can still have a Squeezebox network, it just seems that the future
doesn't look too bright at the moment. Sorry erland, I didn't see that
many positives coming out of the interview myself, maybe
erland;671582 Wrote:
It doesn't matter if we like it or not, but if Squeezebox is going to
survive within Logitech they need to be able to bring it to the masses,
and to be able to do that they are going to make some people on these
forums disapointed but in my mind that's still better than
erland;671582 Wrote:
It doesn't matter if we like it or not, but if Squeezebox is going to
survive within Logitech they need to be able to bring it to the masses,
and to be able to do that they are going to make some people on these
forums disapointed.
That's where I disagree with you. The
paulster;671586 Wrote:
That's where I disagree with you. The reason they haven't brought it to
the masses is because they've been absolutely hopeless at marketing and
positioning it.
If you walk into any given Best Buy in the States, for example, you'll
find it in with audio products,
erland;671582 Wrote:
It doesn't matter if we like it or not, but if Squeezebox is going to
survive within Logitech they need to be able to bring it to the masses,
and to be able to do that they are going to make some people on these
forums disapointed but in my mind that's still
toby10;671593 Wrote:
I think many of the audiophile SB customers (I don't qualify myself)
too quickly dismiss the offered online content with a who needs it
attitude.
I would qualify myself as a audiophile user, but I don't think the
issue is the who needs it attitude, but the There aren't
verypsb;671613 Wrote:
I would qualify myself as a audiophile user, but I don't think the
issue is the who needs it attitude, but the There aren't any
streaming services available attitude.
Agreed. But imagine how much more popular SB players would be in your
market if there were actual
verypsb;671613 Wrote:
I would qualify myself as a audiophile user, but I don't think the
issue is the who needs it attitude, but the There aren't any
streaming services available attitude.
+1, although I would only qualify myself as a music lover.
Music is too important for me not to own it,
sebp;671626 Wrote:
Music is too important for me not to own it, and these online services
are like loaning music. I just don't like this idea.
They may be a great way to discover new music, but I couldn't live with
them as my sole mean of listening to music.
I'm perfectly aware most
The product manager should be sacked and they should get someone in who
actually understands what the product it, what demographic will purchase
it
Yep. I've just seen a TV advert for the Brennan player on Sky News here
in England. If a one product SME can do marketing, why not Logitech?
--
amcluesent;671686 Wrote:
The product manager should be sacked and they should get someone in who
actually understands what the product it, what demographic will purchase
it
Yep. I've just seen a TV advert for the Brennan player on Sky News here
in England. If a one product SME can do
Oh dear, something has changed since this posting on a website about the
Duet back in May 21, 2008
Logitech bought Slim Devices, but we retained virtually all (I think
we lost one) the same developers that brought you the Squeezebox
Classic and Transporter. That includes the founder and lead
erland;671582 Wrote:
I guess it's just a matter of what you expected them to say, I was
personally worried that they would say that they are going to drop the
Squeezebox line and focus on iPod docks instead. So compared to that,
the interview was pretty positive.
This is some kind of worst
Here's (my rough and probably inaccurate translation for) an excerpt
from 'an interview'
(http://www.clubic.com/internet/google/google-tv/actualite-458400-logitech-interview-junien-labrousse.html)
by Junien Labrousse (Executive Vice President, Products and President,
Logitech Europe):
NOW THAT
sebp;671384 Wrote:
Here's (my rough and probably inaccurate translation for) an excerpt
from 'an interview'
(http://www.clubic.com/internet/google/google-tv/actualite-458400-logitech-interview-junien-labrousse.html)
by Junien Labrousse (Executive Vice President, Products and President,
On the other hand fixing all the bugs could get us along way without
sacrificing anything
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2
In fact, most of Squeezebox customers today are more interested by the
Internet radio capability.
Like it or not (I do) this is the future of the entire product line and
I'd bet it's the key reason Logitech was really interested in SB in the
first place.
--
toby10
toby10;671395 Wrote:
In fact, most of Squeezebox customers today are more interested by the
Internet radio capability.
Like it or not (I do) this is the future of the entire product line and
I'd bet it's the key reason Logitech was really interested in SB in the
first place.
that is
toby10;671395 Wrote:
In fact, most of Squeezebox customers today are more interested by the
Internet radio capability.
Like it or not (I do) this is the future of the entire product line and
I'd bet it's the key reason Logitech was really interested in SB in the
first place.
I guess
CharlieG;671447 Wrote:
I guess I'm one of the few Squeezebox users who does not use Internet
radio at all (just used it for a short time in 2009). I do understand
how some would use it to discover new music but I don't see myself
using it as a primary source (unless sound quality has gotten
Much of internet radios problems is in it's multitude of everything from
streaming quality to a plethora of formats apps and streaming
aggregatetors broadcasters and whatnot .
Sometimes working against there user interest and revert to obscure
formats only usable from a pc , or by constantly
Is having your own music collection now a thing of the past?
Do the majority of Squeezebox users what their music collection in the
cloud?
Do the majority of Squeezebox users only listen to radio?
Do they care about the fidelity of the sound?
Big decisions. Could have huge ramifications for
I hear you.
I was dismayed enough when they introduced a mono product (the Radio)
and then discontinued the Transporter without a proper hi-fi component
replacement.
Funny enough I was just thinking about adding a couple of Touches to
get some more zones, but I'm now going to look at the
paulster;671487 Wrote:
I hear you.
I was dismayed enough when they introduced a mono product (the Radio)
and then discontinued the Transporter without a proper hi-fi component
replacement.
Funny enough I was just thinking about adding a couple of Touches to
get some more zones, but I'm
Why all the panic and rumour?
The Touch is perfectly useable via LMS, even if development stops
and/or mysb.com shuts down. That's a lot more then many other systems
which depend almost exclusively on a database server accessible via the
internet.
Calm down.
--
castalla
1 Touch - Muse M50
sebp;671384 Wrote:
Here's (my rough and probably inaccurate translation for) an excerpt
from 'an interview'
(http://www.clubic.com/internet/google/google-tv/actualite-458400-logitech-interview-junien-labrousse.html)
by Junien Labrousse (Executive Vice President, Products and President,
paulster;671487 Wrote:
I was dismayed enough when they introduced a mono product (the Radio)
and then discontinued the Transporter without a proper hi-fi component
replacement.
Funny enough I was just thinking about adding a couple of Touches to
get some more zones, but I'm now going to
erland;671554 Wrote:
Audiophiles are still going to want the CD because of the quality
difference, but Logitech can't target audiophiles because on that
market they are going to compete with HiFi manufacturers and most
audiophiles are going to trust something with a HiFi manufacturer logo
paulster;671557 Wrote:
They still own the SlimDevices brand. Use it.
My Ultimate Ears personal monitors are still called Ultimate Ears since
Logitech bought them, because no touring professional in their right
mind would rely on a Logitech-branded product. There's no reason why
they
shaboyi;671001 Wrote:
Please, please, please replace the Touch, get a good USB dac and enjoy
MediaMonkey. You should be happier.
Can you explain why this strange piece of advice ?
Like a lot of people, I love the Touch hardware, but I am fed up with
SBS/LMS.
It is a common point of view
aubuti;670630 Wrote:
Thanks, Gingernut63, for laying out the pros and cons so clearly. Given
my situation, I personally don't see the appeal, because SBS works
reliably for me, and MM/MS's inability to do multiple streams is a
dealbreaker. But I'm glad it's there for others who might
Please, please, please replace the Touch, get a good USB dac and enjoy
MediaMonkey. You should be happier.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35 AM, nicolas75
nicolas75.53as5z1321450...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote:
Gingernut63;670431 Wrote:
@nicolas75, aubuti
This is not totally
aubuti;670379 Wrote:
I'm curious to try MediaMonkey, but before I go to the bother of
installing it, could you explain how MM gets the tracks from my
computer to my stereo systems? I've browsed the MM web page, and so far
to me it looks to be more like iTunes, Winamp, Foobar2000, etc. That
Accepted.
On 16 Nov 2011, at 07:44, Muele wrote:
cunobelinus;670449 Wrote:
On 16 Nov 2011, at 07:30, Muele wrote:
Btw I'm very pleased to here that Logitech is devoted to Squeezebox.
Pleased to where?
Ja, undskyld at engelsk ikke er mit modersmål. Men jeg rettede dog
fejlen to
I've reduced the amount of time I spent 'working' on my SB/music system
this year (first born arrived in Jan), 4 main tools I use to reduce the
overhead
1) Reliable server - Invested in a HP proliant microserver which is
rock steady, quick and quiet
2) Vortexbox - Installed on above, have had
Gingernut63;670431 Wrote:
@nicolas75, aubuti
This is not totally correct. If you have LMS on your PC then you don't
have to have a LMS music database, hence no scanning. An empty folder
is all that is required for the music folder address. MediaMonkey can
manage your music database
aubuti;670399 Wrote:
Ah, that's what I was afraid of. Doesn't sound like a solution for me.
And I'm already familiar with the capabilities of all-purpose
audio/media software like iTunes, Winamp, Foobar, Songbird, etc etc.
Thanks anyway.
I have to check how MediaMonkey can be controlled
gruntwolla;670428 Wrote:
I also think it's incorrect/unhelpful to state that mediamonkey ( for
example) is years ahead of LMS/SBS. I used to use mediamonkey in my pre
SBS days, and I certainly don't miss it. The name SBS kind of gives it
away really.It's primarily a SERVER, and as far as
Ok, it seems MediaMonkey even have addons to behave as a server
controlled with a web interface.
The more I see it, the more MediaMonkey seems to be everything LMS
should be.
I really use it in a much too basic way ...
--
nicolas75
nicolas75;670531 Wrote:
You probably never use your library the way a lot of people does.
If you want to play some files wherever there are located, without
necesseraly keeping them in your database, and make frequent changes to
your library, MediaMonkey is really years ahead LMS (ease of
Gingernut63;670431 Wrote:
This is not totally correct. If you have LMS on your PC then you don't
have to have a LMS music database, hence no scanning. An empty folder
is all that is required for the music folder address. MediaMonkey can
manage your music database and it tells Squeezebox what
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
