One thing I have to add is a few years after jumping into the bandwagon
of developping plugins for LMS, I'm still amazed by how robust the
architecture is. I'm sure there are some "dark corners" in the code, as
Michael calls them, but there is not a single addition I wanted to
create that I was
I am a lifetime subscriber to Plex Pass (which I only for TV shows and
movies), and I use Subsonic when I'm on the road, and NONE of the
alternatives have the ONE plugin that I absolutely love about LMS:
Charles Parker's Spicefly Sugarcube. I can start a seed track and listen
for hours. Or
I say thanks to Logitech and to Michael for keeping LMS alive and well.
Imho its still the best music server software by some way. Others -
Room & Plex spring to mind - have features that Id like to see it in
LMS but none is fundamentally as good at some core stuff such as
playlist management
mherger wrote:
> As others said I'm still a Logitech employee. And Logitech is not only
> paying for my living and this forum, but
> mysqueezebox.com/uesmartradio.com (which is many times the cost of the
> forum!), build systems, some updates every now and then etc. too.
>
> But the reason
Greg Erskine wrote:
> Michael works for Logitech.
and thats enough of a reason in my book.
---
http://markcathcart.com/about
Running a ReadyNAS NVX LMS Server, currently 7.9.1; Transporter(Living
Room)+Duet Controller; Squeezebox Touch(Master Bedroom),
mherger wrote:
>
> But the reason why LMS is still called LMS is much simpler: renaming it
> is useless effort only, a waste of resources imho.
its even better...
the change from something TO logitechmediaserver isnt even done
everywhere...
eg:
>
Thank you Michael, and thank you Logitech for not turning it off.
Sent from my SM-G955W using Tapatalk
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread:
I pretty much already know the answer
Which is?...
Server" and not the original Squeezebox Server or later iterations. I
know Logitech still owns the name and the (now defunct) hardware, but
It's not really defunct, is it? Existing hardware should still work
pretty much the way it did when
I don't call it Logitech Media Server.
25449
+---+
|Filename: sbs.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=25449|
Greg Erskine wrote:
> Michael works for Logitech.
Also didn't know that he worked for them still. Tells you how much I've
paid attention.
NFLnut's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13180
View
Michael works for Logitech.
Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109337
I didn't realize that they still paid for the SlimDevices forum. I knew
they had the "official" Logitech Squeezeboxen forum which I never found
to be of use. My first Squeezebox was bought right at the time that
Logitech bought the lineage. I remember being glad that it still said
"SlimDevices"
It gives Logitech some modest advertising/exposure, which I'm sure helps
to justify the continued presence of this forum, for which they continue
to pay. Small price, and more power to them.
R.
LMS on a dedicated server (FitPC3)
Transporter (Ethernet) - main listening, Onkyo receiver,
I pretty much already know the answer, and the intent of this question
is NOT to start a flame war NOR to disparage Logitech (although we all
I'm sure harbor some resentment for the killing of the Squeezebox
lineage no matter how fair/unfair it might be but we also are thankful
that they
14 matches
Mail list logo
