RE: [slim] a positive SB3 review

2005-12-01 Thread Ben Gladstone
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Zinck Sent: 30 November 2005 19:01 To: discuss@lists.slimdevices.com Subject: Re: [slim] a positive SB3 review It's nice that the review had a positive conclusion but I worry that all of it's omissions

Re: [slim] a positive SB3 review

2005-12-01 Thread Aaron Zinck
for mass adoption, our favourite music player HAS to work quickly and effortlessly out of the box It's a good point and there is probably a lot of room for improvement there. There are still lots of very geeky things about the interface, the software probably makes too many assumptions about

Re: [slim] a positive SB3 review

2005-12-01 Thread Kevin Weller
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Simon Still wrote: the switch that had appeared that was needed for the thing to actually work was buried in the first 'server settings' page. Where? (asks someone who can't get it to work and can't find a setting on the /server settings/ first page!) Thanks.

[slim] a positive SB3 review

2005-11-30 Thread Ben Gladstone
http://www.denguru.com/2005/11/30/squeezebox_for_in_home_music_distribut ion/ (sister site of Tom's Hardware) generally very positive: It is scary how much thought has been put into making the Squeezebox a useful audio tool but he makes the point that the slimserver setup process is not very

Re: [slim] a positive SB3 review

2005-11-30 Thread Aaron Zinck
It's nice that the review had a positive conclusion but I worry that all of it's omissions and inaccuracies might turn folks away from the SB3. It seems as though this reviewer never bothered to look at the manual or spend any time with the SB3 as he was baffled even by how to properly cue music.