Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Funding opprtunity?

2017-02-10 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 02/10/2017 02:58 PM, Tufts wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Bryan Richter > wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:40:52PM +0100, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote: >> >> On 09.02.2017 19:04, Bryan Richter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 >> at 05:40:24PM +0100,

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] New situation

2016-12-10 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 12/09/2016 11:00 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > Hi all, > > I have taken a full-time job in Portland, so effective immediately I am > "just another" Snowdrift volunteer. Yay! Now I can continue to help out > the project without being a big, immediate expense for the organization > while its cash

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Clearer slogan?

2016-09-20 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 09/20/2016 08:40 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 09/20/2016 01:04 AM, mray wrote: >> On 20.09.2016 02:25, David Thomas wrote: >>> What about dropping "fund"? "Crowdmatching for public goods" >> What about dropping "for"? >> >> "Crowdmatching for public goods" >> "Crowdmatching public goods" >>

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-09 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 08/09/2016 08:09 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 08/09/2016 06:31 AM, Stephen Michel wrote: >> On August 9, 2016 8:59:16 AM EDT, Bryan Richter wrote: >>> >>> I suggest we specify it as a maximum fee percentage, however, to help >>> adapt to future fee differences. That being

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] How the limit works

2016-08-08 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 08/03/2016 06:19 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > > I want to propose my solution as the *final* one for MVP: The limit is > accepted as a hard limit for any charge in any given month, because it > makes things as easy and reliable as possible for the patrons. Whenever > there needs to be a carry-over,

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] UX questions for password reset

2016-06-06 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 06/04/2016 06:56 AM, Stephen Michel wrote: > > On June 4, 2016 5:21:31 AM EDT, mray wrote: >> >> On 04.06.2016 08:35, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote: >>> Bryan Richter skreiv 04. juni 2016 03:47: There are two situations where I'm not sure what the best action is. >>> IMO, the

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-18 Thread Michael Siepmann
On 05/18/2016 05:51 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:13:34PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote: >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:21:23AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: >>> Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. >>> We have to make some decisions, but

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Tipbox, FLO software for getting feedback…

2016-05-17 Thread Michael Siepmann
that typically anonymity would be a strong concern for people offering feedback to Snowdrift. The feedback form page could potentially offer a link for anyone who prefers it, though? Michael Siepmann, Ph.D. *The Tech Design Psychologist*™ /Shaping technology to help people flourish/™ 303-835

[Discuss] Possible visual aid for discussing whether is a good fit for a project

2016-01-23 Thread Michael Siepmann
This is very much a first draft to illustrate an idea, but I'm sending it now in case it could be helpful at SCALE. Best, Michael Will be a good fit for your project DRAFT 01.odg Description: application/ Will be a good fit for