On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:30:19AM +0300, Bryan Richter wrote:
>
> After thinking about it this weekend, I think I'm comfortable with
> putting this on the near-term roadmap.
Update: https://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/issue/472
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:23:49PM -0500, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
>
> Bryan wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:18:43PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> Update: I checked with Crowd Supply what they do…
>>>
>>> They say they simply have a form that doesn't use any JS, they
>>> process the form
, September 3, 2016 10:41
To: discuss@lists.snowdrift.coop
Reply To: General discussion about Snowdrift.coop
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Using Stripe.js will break LibreJS
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:18:43PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> Update: I checked with Crowd Supply what they do…
>
>
Update: I checked with Crowd Supply what they do…
They say they simply have a form that doesn't use any JS, they process
the form data server-side and send to stripe via Stripe's API, and they
never store any payment data to disk so avoid any extra compliance burden.
This approach would work
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:15:48PM +0300, Bryan Richter wrote:
>
> I think we need to bend on this one, accept the realities of 2016, and
> use stripe.js anyway. We can try to provide advanced warning to
> LibreJS/noscript fans if it's truly necessary.
Also, it would be quite simple to restrict
I found this in their IRC log:
https://botbot.me/freenode/stripe/2015-01-27/?msg=30596784=6
Confirmed just now:
https://botbot.me/freenode/stripe/2016-09-01/?msg=72325992=5
(Unfortunately I asked my question right as some lunatic was spamming
their channel with help requests, heh)
If we don't