Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-17 Thread Peter Harpending
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP. Holding > funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small benefit > -- and it's something that we could transition to later anyway. > > Imagine

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-17 Thread Stephen Michel
To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP. Holding funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small benefit -- and it's something that we could transition to later anyway. Imagine we're doing arrears, because that's the easier way. Then, because we

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-07 Thread James Sheldon
I had always just assumed that when you funded an account it was charged at the time. I guess I hadn't considered other possibilities. I'm not sure I know enough to actually make a decision on this, and think some professional help would be useful. On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Bryan Richter

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-06 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 05/06/2016 06:55 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > [moving to discuss list] > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: >> On 05/06/2016 12:10 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: >>> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:31:52AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: In short, I read your comments

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-06 Thread Bryan Richter
[moving to discuss list] On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 05/06/2016 12:10 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:31:52AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> > >> > >> In short, I read your comments above as though you have assumed we are > >> holding