I think what the author's getting at with respect to git's mental model is that
commits form a directed graph, with each commit pointing to its parent (or
parents, in the case of merge commits), and with "branches" just functioning as
names that point to a particular commit. The gnarly set of
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:11 AM, P Lijnzaad wrote:
> Git's "mental model" is really big, with up to 5 places where your edits my
> live (working copy; stash; index; repository; remote), so I personally
> hesitate a bit to 'force' git on my casually coding co-workers. I
Hi all,
We're hiring a postdoc at my organization, and someone with SWC skills and
some knowledge of infectious disease would likely fit the bill. Info at
http://www.ecohealthalliance.org/careers#pg-102-1 and pasted below. Feel
free to get in touch with me about more details.
Noam
---
On 13/04/16 17:03, Jonah Duckles wrote:
Raniere,
No, I have never experienced that misconception.
I have actually encountered the same kind of thing, that person for some
reason got the understanding that we were teaching them some sort of
statistics software.
Kairn
Raniere,
No, I have never experienced that misconception.
---
Jonah Duckles
Software Carpentry, Executive Director
http://software-carpentry.org
From: Raniere Silva
Reply: Raniere Silva
Date: April 12, 2016 at 7:32:58 AM
To: Software Carpentry Discuss
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Tyson Whitehead wrote:
> Saw this blog post the other day.
>
> http://blog.plover.com/prog/two-things-about-git.html
>
> Perhaps if we emphasis the underlying model it git a bit more it will be
> easier for students to follow the rest.
>
>
Saw this blog post the other day.
http://blog.plover.com/prog/two-things-about-git.html
Perhaps if we emphasis the underlying model it git a bit more it will be easier
for students to follow the rest.
Cheers! -Tyson
___
Discuss mailing list