Can someone remind me why we discourage forking of the lesson-template/example?
On 23 June 2015 at 17:30, Ivan Gonzalez igl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Maneesha,
Yes. If you want to make changes to the git lesson, for example, you should
go to the lesson repo on Github [1] and fork it.
On Fri 06 Mar, Matt Davis wrote:
I've been advocating off-list that we do charge corporations more for
workshops than we charge universities, and I think this is another good
reason to do that. (While still asking our instructors to be
volunteers--the additional money would all go to SWC.)
I
On Sun 08 Mar, Martin Bähr wrote:
Excerpts from Aaron O'Leary's message of 2015-03-08 10:43:47 +0100:
Volunteering is bad, for the same reason that unpaid internships are
bad: access is limited to those who can afford the time to participate.
Volunteering is socially exlusive.
woha, that
I emailed Greg privately in response to this. Here it is:
Hi Greg,
I just want to register that something about this doesn't sit right with me.
I'm not sure whether it is because of Monsanto's poor ethical record
or because they are a huge multi-national, but my instinct is that
they (and other
Is there an API for this? I can't see anything in the docs about it.
Could we embed this in the workshop-template page so that you only have to
type a new repository name?
On 11 January 2015 at 03:26, Greg Wilson gvwil...@software-carpentry.org
wrote:
I exchanged email with Arfon Smith at
Have you got a plan for the transition from bc to separate lessons?
Will this happen once history for all lessons is extracted or just as
they come? How about a set date for the change?
I'm thinking about PRs that come up between now and the transition to
the separate lesson: should these
