In 1995 Mr gates was still calling the Internet just a passing fad.
In 1999 I was still hearing certain diehard MS fans repeating that opinion
as fact. It took ages to tract that one down.
Like I said earlier it appears all part of a theme in a campaign to
rewrite Gates' past and re-paint
Is OOo2 likely to run comfortably on those specs?
Or will it need to be pared down and streamlined for OOo3 first?
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Software patents kill innovation and harm all Net-based business.
Keep them out of the EU by writing your MEP, keep the market
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:34 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote:
Yep, Bill denies saying it. Of course he denies a lot of things :)
What he did or did not say misses the point. What matters is that DOS
was badly designed in the first place. It got taken up because suits in
industry trusted IBM as the
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:07:50 -, Lars D. Noodén
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is OOo2 likely to run comfortably on those specs?
Or will it need to be pared down and streamlined for OOo3 first?
Many people had run OOo on 64Mb of Ram. So no worries about this.
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:44, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:07:50 -, Lars D. Noodén
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is OOo2 likely to run comfortably on those specs?
Or will it need to be pared down and streamlined for OOo3 first?
Many people had run OOo on 64Mb of Ram. So no
Chad Smith wrote:
On 11/15/05, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wake me up when there's MSOffice for linux, FreeBSD, BeOS, etc.
Crossover Office, WINE, Win4Lin.
But it is NOT native so it isn't for Linux, FreeBSD, BeOS, etc. It is
running via an emulator so John's original
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 18:38 +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 07:45 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
[snip]
[snip]
You're showing my age, Ian! It was 640 Kb of RAM.
That was Robin :-) There was also a story that Bill Gates visited
On 11/16/05, Robin Laing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it is NOT native so it isn't for Linux, FreeBSD, BeOS, etc. It is
running via an emulator so John's original statement stands.
OOo doesn't run on Mac natively. It has to have a foreign windowing system
for it to work. Does that mean OOo
Robin Laing wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 18:38 +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 07:45 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
[snip]
You're showing my age, Ian! It was 640 Kb of RAM.
snip
Man you are right. It was 640K, not 640M. Ouch.
I
Gentlemen,
I am a retired technical translator and used to work with
Windows Word text processor.
Usually I split the text entry window and load in one of
them the source language text while I write the translated
text into the orther window.
Obviously, this procedure requires to use two
Hello,
I'm using open office 2.0 and I notice that when I use spell check, if it
corrects a word that is capitalised, the correction is never capitalised. It
would be much easier if the spell checker in the next version just noticed
the capitalisation and corrected accordingly.
Thank you for
On Thursday 17 Nov 2005 11:44, Chad Smith wrote:
On 11/16/05, Tim Fairchild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It can hardly be 'tied' to the windows platform when it runs on all the
unix
types. Of course you may say that MSO is no longer tied to windows either
since it can run on Mac and many unix
12 matches
Mail list logo
