Disclaimer: I'm not a legal professional or expert in any way, so what I
say below may be completely wrong.
Be careful, because I believe it is the case that any licence or
contract is overruled by the state & federal legislation that applies to
your jurisdiction. In other words, even if the GPL s
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:11:59 +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Sam Stainsby wrote:
>>I also work for an organisation that is unwilling to move away from
>>Microsoft Office because they feel that they need the calendaring and
>>meeting arrangement facilities of Outlook, on
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:14:08 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 15 novembre 2005 à 08:01 +1000, Sam Stainsby a écrit :
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:46:57 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jonathon Blake wrote:
>> >> Just what fu
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:05:29 +, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Well feel free to hire developers to commit to the project we surely need
> as much as we can get. :)
I hear you there. Unfortunately, my company is just starting up, and the
only resource is going to be me for some time I suspect.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:46:57 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jonathon Blake wrote:
>> Just what functionality does MSO + Outlook offer, that can not be
>> replicated by using OOo + FireFox + ThunderBird + SunBird + the
>> appropriate templates?
> [...]
>
> +1
>
Example 1:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:12:37 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
> Individuals can buy a Retail copy of MSO for $150. Busineses can get it for
> cheaper if they buy in volume and/or buy it OEM. As both prices decrease
> (MSO and just OL) the differences also decrease, to the point it would be
> wasteful to bu
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:24:27 -0500, William Baric wrote:
> I had one of them who was willing to switch to OpenOffice. They didn't
> have too much money and they were willing to put up with OpenOffice's
> Word, Excel and PowerPoint import/export filter (thanks to MS Viewers).
> They were also willi
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:09:36 -0600, Robin Laing wrote:
>
> It sounds like you are looking for replacements for Exchange Server
> more than just outlook. There was a recent discussion on the Fedora
> list about this.
The clients have to have the features that our users want. Of course the
serve
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:19:00 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> As others have mentioned, Mozilla or Thunderbird will handle mail and
> addressbook functions, calendaring is under development. Evolution will
> handle maiol, address book and calendaring.
>
> You can read more about or download Mozi
