Away from the control panel I don't see any substancial difference with the
1.1.4 version. Can someone shed some explanation of some 'real' changes (on the
UI) on OOoBase from 1.x to 2.x?
--
Alexandro Colorado
Co-Leader of OpenOffice.org Spanish
http://es.openoffice.org/
Mensaje citado por Don H
[Pre criticism disclaimer - I LIKE Open Office a lot and appreciate all the
work done on it]
for once I think following the Microsoft model is a bad idea
The Lotus Approach database - though not so well updated as MS - is better and
more user friendly in its interface - and also uses multiple
databases
but we did need something for smaller scale "my mailing list" sized databases
which don't require many features.
-Original Message-
From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2005 6:46 AM
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discus
The again to be honest we still havent have a 'stable' implementation of the
native database format into the OpenOffice.org GUI.
Also MySQL products lack things that Access has like 'Views', while Oracle and
PostgreSQL have stored process that are not supported by the GUI.
Access is also a very u
--- Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bealach wrote:
>
> > However if the PC World review of Oo2 beta is right the database is very
> > much like M$ Access which PC World claims is not very good and users
> > don't like it very much.
>
> This is very vague. Can you elaborate on exact
bealach wrote:
> However if the PC World review of Oo2 beta is right the database is very
> much like M$ Access which PC World claims is not very good and users
> don't like it very much.
This is very vague. Can you elaborate on exactly what is wrong with it and
what should be different?
Supp
Hello,
I've been reading the news on PC World about the addition of a database
in Ooo2.
However if the PC World review of Oo2 beta is right the database is very
much like M$ Access which PC World claims is not very good and users
don't like it very much.
Well, OOo writer is much better than M$
