It seems when dull-nat can be supported, the performance can be improved
with reduced upcalls.
I have also asked a question about SNAT flag but currently got reply, hope
guys implement NAT feature can help us:)
2016-12-09 19:33 GMT+08:00 Zang MingJie :
> Hi:
>
> I'm trying
Hi Ben,
Thanks a lot for your prompt and reasonably fix.
2016-12-06 3:38 GMT+08:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:21:36AM +0800, 张东亚 wrote:
> > We are now using unix stream socket (using openflowj as encoder/decoder
> of
> > OpenFlow messa
Hi list,
We are now using unix stream socket (using openflowj as encoder/decoder of
OpenFlow message) to emulate ovs-ofctl behavior, we occasionally trigger
the assertion above, and I have found other one have reported the same bug
in June this year.
After I have read the code and I can now
wil send a patch to disable
under kernel < 3.17.
Thanks a lot.
2016-11-24 17:37 GMT+08:00 张东亚 <fortitude.zh...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Ovs 2.5.0+ have registered internal_dev_link_ops to kernel, and also set
> rtnl_link_ops field of net_device.
>
> However, under kernel
, is
vxlan receive offload feature not work on these two ovs versions desired
for this kernel?
2016-10-25 10:39 GMT+08:00 张东亚 <fortitude.zh...@gmail.com>:
> Hi List,
>
> We have now testing openvswitch 2.6.0 on kernel 3.10.45, however we
> noticed there is performance drop than
Hi List,
We have now testing openvswitch 2.6.0 on kernel 3.10.45, however we noticed
there is performance drop than openvswitch 2.5.0 on the same kernel, which
iperf can only have a 2G bandwidth for a pair of 10G links.
After check the code, it seems on openvswitch 2.5.0, HAVE_METADATA_DST
macro
Hi Darrel Ball,
Glad to hear that, thank a lot for provide the information.
2016-09-20 7:41 GMT+08:00 Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>:
> I am working on DPDK NAT support and targeting 2.7.
>
>
>
> Darrell
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *discuss <d
Hi Justin,
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply, we will try the ct feature first.
2016-09-19 13:56 GMT+08:00 Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org>:
>
> > On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:21 PM, 张东亚 <fortitude.zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > So that mea
18, 2016 at 08:24:57PM +0800, 张东亚 wrote:
> > From ovs 2.6 branch NEWS file, it have stated the following sentence:
> >
> > Basic connection tracking for the userspace datapath (no ALG,
> > fragmentation or NAT support yet)
> >
> > I am wonder what's the d
Hi List,
>From ovs 2.6 branch NEWS file, it have stated the following sentence:
Basic connection tracking for the userspace datapath (no ALG,
fragmentation or NAT support yet)
I am wonder what's the developmenent schedule for userspace NAT based on
DPDK, will it be released with first OVS 2.6
t; doesn't affect OVS ports, just their representation in the sFlow
> agent. I believe the intention was to make sure that all internal
> agent state was reset cleanly on a configuration change. For
> example, the sequence number for packet and counter samples is
> required to
Hi Neil,
There is another question regarding the issue, seems dpif_sflow_add_port
will call dpif_sflow_del_port port every time, does this is intended to
remove previously added dsp since dp_port might be same for different
tunnel port?
2016-08-29 11:16 GMT+08:00 张东亚 <fortitude.zh...@gmail.
el_proto(in_dsp->tunnel_type) : 0;
>
> Neil
>
>
> --
> Neil McKee
> InMon Corp.
> http://www.inmon.com
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:30 AM, 张东亚 <fortitude.zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Recently we are testing sFlow on OVS 2.5.0, si
Hi List,
Recently we are testing sFlow on OVS 2.5.0, since OVS decide whether do
sample based on ingress bridge, we then enable sFlow on br-tun, and
encounter following crash:
#0 0x00434ca8 in dpif_sflow_received (ds=0x4266100,
packet=packet@entry=0x7f3cb3fc8e18,
Hi Jesse,
Thanks a lot for your information, seems the commit have been merged to
v4.6+ kernel which may not be easily for us to upgrade.
We will try to upgrade to lastest OVS and do test again.
2016-07-13 22:48 GMT+08:00 Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org>:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:0
Hi,
Recently we upgraded to ovs 2.5 and use the datapath in the ovs code(means
we do not use kernel datapath), however, when we test vxlan performance
between two VMs on different compute node, we observed the bandwidth can
only achieve 5Gbps on the 10Gbps intel nic pair, and we are still using
Hi all,
We have used ovsdb-server/openvswitch for a long time on our switch
which use an freescale SoC p1010 with cpu core frequency set to 533Mhz,
recently we want to add 1000 GRE tunnel ports support to our switch,
however, we have observed significant slow down when we trying to
configure more
Hi,
I have built an ovs (master-bfe834e) and found and segment fault error
when I do the following operation:
1. start ovs-vswitchd and ovsdb-server
2. set and controller that does not exist, ovs-vsctl set-controller br0
tcp:127.0.0.1(which will lead connect refused error when ovs trying to
18 matches
Mail list logo