Jerome Louvel wrote:
Hi Marc,
This is the intended behavior. For query string, you get auto-decoding using a Form.
For other situations (path variables), you can manually use
Reference.decode(URI) methods.
ah cool, patched my sample with that call and things get decoded
allright now,
After having put up a service that uses wildcard certificates for SSL,
I've found
Java's default of rejecting wildcards very broken. Fortunately, you can fix
that by setting the HostnameVerifier on the HttpsURLConnection instance.
What this means is that, unfortunately, the java.net
On 7/26/07, Adam Taft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're asking what's the best practice to use when coding your Resource.
Exactly!
This approach allows the library to do the automatic content negotiation
and call getRepresentation(Variant v) with the appropriate Variant. If
you short circuit
Hi Marc,
Thanks for finding these issues, I've fixed the NPE and the second issue in
SVN.
For the java.nio.channels.IllegalBlockingModeException one, I would need
more details to reproduce it. Which Restlet version, which HTTP client and
server connectors?
Best regards,
Jerome
-Message
On 7/25/07, Jerome Louvel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Avi,
The JDBC extension is mostly useful if you want to manipulate your database
through XML representations (XML requests and XML responses). For other use
cases, such as supporting Resources as Domain Objects, I would recommend
more
Hi all,
I have quickly read over this thread and like to mention that it can be
useful to use content negotiation even for DELETE methods.
Indeed, a DELETE method can return an entity. In this case you can manually
call Resource.getPreferredRepresentation() to set the Response's entity
after
Geoffrey Wiseman wrote:
This approach allows the library to do the automatic content negotiation
and call getRepresentation(Variant v) with the appropriate Variant. If
you short circuit this and add in your Representation during
construction, basically you miss out on the ability to switch
Hi Marc,
[...]
Just a follow up question: for reading the request params I found:
- from the query-string
request.getResourceRef().getQueryAsForm(); // optional param charset
- from the http body
request.getEntityAsForm();
(noticing this last one doesn't have an optional charset param
Sean Landis wrote:
The nature of the data is
a clientId and a callId. These are going to be used for governance and
should be part of every call in our environment. It seemed to me that
since it was not application related, that it ought to be hidden. I'd love
to hear about alternatives
Jerome Louvel wrote:
Hi Marc,
[...]
Just a follow up question: for reading the request params I found:
- from the query-string
request.getResourceRef().getQueryAsForm(); // optional param charset
- from the http body
request.getEntityAsForm();
(noticing this last one doesn't have an
Based on what you wrote Adam, it sounds like you would agree that using
hidden parameters in this case doesn't break REST. Now that I've explained
what we are trying to accomplish, can you suggest a more RESTful
approach? We are very interested in being as RESTful as possible.
Sounds like
On 7/27/07, Jerome Louvel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for teaching me new aspects of SSL :)
We have a RFE to improve SSL support in Restlet 1.1, I've updated it to
propose the addition of a connector parameter. See details here:
12 matches
Mail list logo