RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-12-27 Thread Tal Liron
Great! I agree with this new direction. Well, for now I will implement your requested feature. > Hi Tal, > > In RF 3.0, we should really give more precise control regarding extensions -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=44

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-12-26 Thread Jerome Louvel
Hi Tal, In RF 3.0, we should really give more precise control regarding extensions usage for: - connectors - converters - authenticators The configuration of a Restlet component or application should be explicit and fully available programmatically. I'm even considering fully removing

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-26 Thread Tal Liron
Actually, it's a feature I would like to see with *all* Restlet extensions: it would be nice for users to be able select which extensions they want to use, rather than configure it solely via the classpath. Possibly with Java properties? I can imagine every extension class having an "enabled" p

Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-25 Thread Jerome Louvel
Thanks Tal, this looks great. We might want to add parameters to disable/enable the client/server connector from the extension as a second step to allow mixing of several connector extensions. I've added a note about this to the matching ticket: https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/is

RE: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-22 Thread Tal Liron
I went ahead and also added a Jetty 9 client connector: https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 Note that if you add the Jar to your classpath, both the server and client connectors will be activated. -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessa

Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-11 Thread Jerome Louvel
It looks good, thanks Tal! Jerome 2013/11/9 Tal Liron > Binaries and API documentation are now available via the GitHub project > site. > > Enjoy! > > > https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 > > -- > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMess

RE: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-09 Thread Tal Liron
Binaries and API documentation are now available via the GitHub project site. Enjoy! > https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3068157

RE: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-08 Thread Tal Liron
Excellent. If anyone has comments, here is the GitHub issue: https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/issues/793 > That's fine Tal, whatever works best for you. Merging by hand won't be a > big issue anyway. > > You might want to enter an issue in RF repo to let people discover this > s

Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-07 Thread Jerome Louvel
That's fine Tal, whatever works best for you. Merging by hand won't be a big issue anyway. You might want to enter an issue in RF repo to let people discover this support and let us communicate over it. Best regards, Jerome 2013/11/7 Tal Liron > Thanks, Jerome. > > I picked the Apache License

RE: Re: Re: Jetty 9?

2013-11-07 Thread Tal Liron
Thanks, Jerome. I picked the Apache License 2.0, and am hosting it as a separate project. I'm assigning joint copyright on it to Restlet S.A.S, per the contributor agreement, so you are free to merge it should you ever wish to do so: https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 Rather than a branc