Hi Jim,
This isn't supported yet, which is unfortunate when you need a custom log
format. The default format is hard-coded in Java, that's why I forgot to add
it to the Template class.
I've entered a RFE for 1.1:
http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=320
Best regards,
Jerome
Hi all,
This RFE is now fixed in SVN trunk and will be testable in the upcoming 1.1
snapshot. Great optimization, thanks Stian for the idea.
Best regards,
Jerome
-Message d'origine-
De : Jerome Louvel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2007 08:55
À :
Hi Leigh,
I've implemented the suggested change on the ServletConverter class
only. The code is checked in SVN trunk.
However, I'm relunctant to extend this to the ServletServlet itself
because the target Restlet Application would loose its portability to a
standalone Restlet container.
Hi Dustin,
The WAR client is automatically installed when you use the ServerServlet
adapter. In Restlet 1.1, this will work with the standalone mode too, so
Application portability will be intact.
So, you can already simplify your code like this:
public Representation
Hi Stian and Adam,
This is indeed a very interesting topic. In the past, a similar mapping from
Resource to URIs was already suggested, reusing the same declarations used
by the Router.
Like you I agree that this is a common need but I'm not really sure yet how
to support this in the API, and
Hi Joshua,
Unfortunately, we don't support client multipart posts yet. You will have to
manually use the Apache HTTP client for now. I've updated the existing RFE
with this specific request:
http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71
Best regards,
Jerome
-Message d'origine-
Hi Adam,
This is indeed a frequently asked question, but it didn't have a FAQ entry
yet :) So I just had to write it:
http://www.restlet.org/documentation/1.0/faq#24
Best regards,
Jerome
-Message d'origine-
De : Adam Taft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 16 juin 2007
Hi Jerome,
Cheers. Thanks for the FAQ entry. For whatever reason, I couldn't see
the (now obvious) solution.
From the FAQ:
Note that after doing this, your Router won't accept URI with query
strings going to this Resource.
Big bummer. Maybe this could be a RFE. Ie. strict matching
8 matches
Mail list logo