Thierry Boileau gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I send you a complete Eclipse project which works on my environment. It
> contains 2 applications with both Resource and Directory.
> The problem is located in this part of the code :
>
> getDefaultHost().attach("/meta", new MyApplication(g
Yes I have the TunnelService on but off for extensions. The FileClientHelper
search for a file with file starting with the same baseName and having the
same set of extensions : no surprise it finds test2.xml.
I'll be off for the end of the week. I will test it as soon as possible and
investigate a
Hi,
I'm testing out grizzly connector with the 1.1M4 built and I noticed that for
requests takes a bit longer to generate the report, sometimes the following
exceptions occurs:
Jul 2, 2008 4:01:11 PM com.noelios.restlet.http.HttpServerConverter commit
INFO: Exception intercepted
java.io.IOExcepti
Hello Thierry,
thanks a lot for responding so quickly and for your help - I greatly
appreciate it!
Apparently, you were at least partly right about the libraries - changing
them to the newer version 1.1 (Test) has changed the behavior - but it is
still not the way it should be...
I have prepa
> This approach forces you to manage threads explicitly and thus won't
> work with, for example, the Executor framework.
Yeah, but on the other hand the explicit thread local API should come
with a warning to be used only under duress and application developers
should generally be keeping a clean
Hello Rémi,
I'm not able to reproduce your problem with Restlet 1.1M4. I send you my
sample code.
It contains a directory and 2 restlet, one that creates/updates the
"test.xml" file, the other the "test2.xml" file.
Just hot http://localhost:8182/restletPut1 and
http://localhost:8182/restletPut
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Jerome Louvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to ensure that the methods still work when invoked by another
> thread, the engine could keep a copy of those thread local variables are
> restore them on the new thread when calling again the Restlet code.
>
> Fo
Hi Alex,
I'll start with the short answer: the workaround you're using, which
consists of putting a single pair of key/certificate (with associated
chain of certificates perhaps) per keystore, seems to be the most
practical solution.
That's what I do, personally. I find it easier to manage m
Hello,
I have an issue with the implementation of PUT on files.
Let say I have files in a directory :
test.xml
test2.xml
If I make a PUT on test.xml it will modify test2.xml which is not exactilly
what I would expect.
I don't really catch what I don't understand reading from line 187 to line
219 in
Christian Möller gmx.de> writes:
> Thierry Boileau gmail.com> writes:
> > the configuration of a component in the context of a servlet container
> > is only available with Restlet 1.1.
> > Could you try with Restlet 1.1M4 or the latest snapshot
> > (http://www.restlet.org/downloads/)?
>
> I've
Hi Thierry,
Thierry Boileau gmail.com> writes:
> the configuration of a component in the context of a servlet container
> is only available with Restlet 1.1.
> Could you try with Restlet 1.1M4 or the latest snapshot
> (http://www.restlet.org/downloads/)?
I've done the upgrade but unfortunately
Hi,
for my thesis it is good, if I know, when Restlet 1.1 should be
released. http://www.restlet.org/about/roadmap says Q2 2008. That's no
more possibe :-)
Could you update the page, so I can refer to it?
best regards
Stephan
12 matches
Mail list logo
