Internal Connector Error (1002) - allowUserInteraction is not supported.

2009-04-23 Thread Olivier Bruchez
Hello, I'm porting one of my Restlet/GWT-based applications to Google App Engine. At some point, the application tries to get some XML from another server: Client client = new Client(Protocol.HTTP); Response response = client.get(uri); This was working before. Now, I get the following response

RE: At the root of my webservice - what's best practice

2009-04-23 Thread Simon Earnshaw
Can admin delete this as I double posted by mistake - thanks. -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=1862458

Re: Internal Connector Error (1002) - allowUserInteraction is not supported.

2009-04-23 Thread Jose Javier GarcĂ­a Zornoza
Hello, This is working for me: Button getXMLButton = new Button(Get XML); getXMLButton.addClickListener(new ClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(Widget sender) { final Client client = new Client(Protocol.HTTP);

RE: JSP/Servlet Representation

2009-04-23 Thread Philippe Duchesne
Hi all, i've faced a similar problem, so let me share how i solved it. I'm running Restlet within a tomcat instance, and I want to have representations encoded using JSP pages. I also want to delegate the JSP encoding to the tomcat JSP engine to re-use other resources/jsps from my webapp. What

Re: help on PUT

2009-04-23 Thread helen chen
I worked with weblogic support and we proved that weblogic support the PUT request. helen chen hc...@aip.org 04/06/09 8:37 AM Hi Thierry, I tested the POST method and it works. So I think you are right, there maybe some configuration in weblogic that stoped PUT request. I'm going to contact

RE: Re: Internal Connector Error (1002) - allowUserInteraction is not supported.

2009-04-23 Thread webpost
This works for me, too. Forgot to mention that my problem occurs on the server-side! Olivier Hello, This is working for me: Button getXMLButton = new Button(Get XML); getXMLButton.addClickListener(new ClickListener() { @Override public void

Re: CRUD Items pattern

2009-04-23 Thread John D. Mitchell
On Apr 22, 2009, at 04:41 , Tal Liron wrote: [...] Thanks, John. De nada. You're right, and of course I am abstracting the core behaviors! My solution so far is actually the opposite of what you suggest. I have two root classes, one for Item, one for Items. Each in turn routes to a