RE: error running b18 on Simple
Hi Chris, Thanks for reporting this regression. It's fixed it in SVN. Make sure you fully refresh your local copy. Best regards, Jerome -Message d'origine- De : Chris Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 10 août 2006 00:24 À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org Objet : error running b18 on Simple On grabbing b18 from svn and compiling, my sample app dies immediately on any request with: Aug 9, 2006 6:16:54 PM com.noelios.restlet.connector.AbstractHttpServer handle WARNING: Error while handling an HTTP server call: Aug 9, 2006 6:16:54 PM com.noelios.restlet.connector.AbstractHttpServer handle INFO: Error while handling an HTTP server call java.lang.NullPointerException at org.restlet.connector.AbstractServer.handle(AbstractServer.java:66) at com.noelios.restlet.connector.AbstractHttpServer.handle(Abstra ctHttpServer.java:86) at com.noelios.restlet.connector.AbstractHttpServer.handle(Abstra ctHttpServer.java:67) at com.noelios.restlet.ext.simple.SimpleServer.handle(SimpleServe r.java:134) at simple.http.Dispatcher.run(Unknown Source) at simple.util.process.Daemon.execute(Unknown Source) at simple.util.process.Daemon.run(Unknown Source) It looks like the 'target' property of AbstractServer isn't being assigned. Chris -- Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lead Software Developer Vocollect Healthcare Systems CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION: This e-mail is private and intended for the addressee(s) only. It may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received it in error you are not authorized to disseminate it in any manner; please delete it and any copies and reply to the sender that it was misdirected.
Re: error running b18 on Simple
Chris Winters wrote: Jerome Louvel wrote: Thanks for reporting this regression. It's fixed it in SVN. Make sure you fully refresh your local copy. Wow, lots of updates! And more API breaks :-) I'll plow through those and let you know how it goes. BTW, thanks for keeping up the relatively detailed notes the changelog. I know it's a PITA to do but much appreciated. Okay, that didn't take too long. Mostly just the MediaType/s collapsing (which is nice). Another thing I noticed is that using a base filename in the DirectoryHandler no longer works. My older code had: DirectoryHandler staticFiles = new DirectoryHandler( this, webUri, index ); which didn't pull up the 'index.html' page on a directory request. Changing it to: DirectoryHandler staticFiles = new DirectoryHandler( this, webUri, index.html ); worked fine. Do you think it's a good idea to have a set of possible files, similar to the Apache directive? I'll post a link to the silly sample app in a few minutes. Thanks for the updates! Chris -- Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lead Software Developer Vocollect Healthcare Systems CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION: This e-mail is private and intended for the addressee(s) only. It may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received it in error you are not authorized to disseminate it in any manner; please delete it and any copies and reply to the sender that it was misdirected.
RE: error running b18 on Simple
Chris, [...] Another thing I noticed is that using a base filename in the DirectoryHandler no longer works. My older code had: DirectoryHandler staticFiles = new DirectoryHandler( this, webUri, index ); which didn't pull up the 'index.html' page on a directory request. Changing it to: DirectoryHandler staticFiles = new DirectoryHandler( this, webUri, index.html ); worked fine. Do you think it's a good idea to have a set of possible files, similar to the Apache directive? The issue is coming from the new negotiationEnabled flag which is turned off by default now. Just do directory.setNegotiationEnabled(true); to enable it. When exposing static files that were generated like Javadocs, there is no need for content negotiation based on file extensions. First, that slows things down a bit and then it creates side-effects with inner class names like Router.Mode because Mode is not a recognized extension, etc. As for having multiple index base names I'm not sure yet because that complexifies things for now. If you really need this you can always setup additional DirectoryHandlers for a specific trees of files. I'll post a link to the silly sample app in a few minutes. Thanks for the updates! I'm looking forward to playing with it :-) Best regards, Jerome
