RE: Re: Re: About XTC (Facelets port)

2010-10-13 Thread webpost
Good news. I managed to overcome all the difficulties. I've got it all working like a charm. I even wrapped up an example maven project containing a working configuration along with some simple classes that I wrote. You can merge it into your project if you like. I really think that if you

RE: Re: Re: About XTC (Facelets port)

2010-10-12 Thread Julek Kopczewski
Hello again! Thank you for your help regarding XTC. After having to deal with some other issues I finally got forced to move from Facelets RI to XTC. This was mostly due to unit testing. The usage of XTC in my case was indeed trivial, just as you indicated. However I have some trouble with

RE: Re: Re: About XTC (Facelets port)

2010-10-12 Thread Julek Kopczewski
Also I've apart from version 0.4.1 published on the deprecated TRAC, I tried checking out the 0.5 version on launchpad. However I couldn't figure out how to build it. I haven't yet got any experience with Ivy. I got stuck with an unresolved dependency to org.eclipse.osgi. On the other hand some

RE: Re: Re: About XTC (Facelets port)

2010-10-12 Thread Julek Kopczewski
Really sorry, for a triple post. Unfortunately I cannot take them down. I somehow got through both previous issues. It turns out that there was some kind of a clash between Facelets and XTC. The validation error was caused by some Facelets classes trying to parse XTC taglibs. I overlooked that.

Re: Re: About XTC (Facelets port)

2010-09-27 Thread Michael Terrington
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:59 AM, webp...@tigris.org wrote: I'm happy to hear that XTC has actually been used in production. That's enough for me to try to use it myself. I suppose the whole integration shouldn't be so difficult altogether. All that there really is to do, is to override

RE: Re: About XTC (Facelets port)

2010-09-26 Thread webpost
I'm happy to hear that XTC has actually been used in production. That's enough for me to try to use it myself. I suppose the whole integration shouldn't be so difficult altogether. All that there really is to do, is to override AbstractUrlBasedView which amounts to implementing a single