RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?
Great! I agree with this new direction. Well, for now I will implement your requested feature. Hi Tal, In RF 3.0, we should really give more precise control regarding extensions -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3070826
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?
Hi Tal, In RF 3.0, we should really give more precise control regarding extensions usage for: - connectors - converters - authenticators The configuration of a Restlet component or application should be explicit and fully available programmatically. I'm even considering fully removing the classpath based auto-registration as it seems to create more problems than solutions. Best regards, Jerome 2013/11/26 Tal Liron tal.li...@threecrickets.com Actually, it's a feature I would like to see with *all* Restlet extensions: it would be nice for users to be able select which extensions they want to use, rather than configure it solely via the classpath. Possibly with Java properties? I can imagine every extension class having an enabled property. Thanks Tal, this looks great. We might want to add parameters to disable/enable the client/server connector from the extension as a second step to allow mixing of several connector extensions. I've added a note about this to the matching ticket: https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/issues/512 -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3069272 -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3070788
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?
Actually, it's a feature I would like to see with *all* Restlet extensions: it would be nice for users to be able select which extensions they want to use, rather than configure it solely via the classpath. Possibly with Java properties? I can imagine every extension class having an enabled property. Thanks Tal, this looks great. We might want to add parameters to disable/enable the client/server connector from the extension as a second step to allow mixing of several connector extensions. I've added a note about this to the matching ticket: https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/issues/512 -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3069272
Re: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?
Thanks Tal, this looks great. We might want to add parameters to disable/enable the client/server connector from the extension as a second step to allow mixing of several connector extensions. I've added a note about this to the matching ticket: https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/issues/512 Jerome 2013/11/22 Tal Liron tal.li...@threecrickets.com I went ahead and also added a Jetty 9 client connector: https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 Note that if you add the Jar to your classpath, both the server and client connectors will be activated. -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3069061 -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3069204
RE: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?
I went ahead and also added a Jetty 9 client connector: https://github.com/tliron/restlet-jetty9 Note that if you add the Jar to your classpath, both the server and client connectors will be activated. -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3069061
RE: Re: Re: Re: Jetty 9?
Excellent. If anyone has comments, here is the GitHub issue: https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/issues/793 That's fine Tal, whatever works best for you. Merging by hand won't be a big issue anyway. You might want to enter an issue in RF repo to let people discover this support and let us communicate over it. Best regards, Jerome -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3068106
