Re: Re: MediaType: should application/xml be compatible with application/*+xml?

Hi Andy :) Yes, this should be the case. Did you try to set the ignoreParameters option on the includes() method? Jérôme 2013/11/5 Andy Dennie tig...@adennie.e4ward.com 4 1/2 years later, I have a follow-up question :-) shouldn't application/json include

RE: Re: Re: MediaType: should application/xml be compatible with application/*+xml?

I took a closer look today, and it's not the ignoreParameters that's at fault (in fact, it should be considered included regardless of whether ignoreParameters is true or false, since ignoreParameters applies to this and not included, and this has no parameters). I think the fix would be to

RE: Re: MediaType: should application/xml be compatible with application/*+xml?

4 1/2 years later, I have a follow-up question :-) shouldn't application/json include application/vnd.foo.bar-baz-v1+json; level=3 ? -- http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447dsMessageId=3067938

Re: MediaType: should application/xml be compatible with application/*+xml?

Hello, I agree with you, I think it should be true. I've just fixed the svn repository. Thank you for the report. best regards, Thierry Boileau Hi, As title, should mediatype application/xml be compatible with application/*+xml? I thought it should be true, but In MediaType.includes