Re: Restlets contained within servlets

Simon Reinhardt koeln.de> writes: > Restlet also has an adaptor for AJP so you could use mod_proxy_ajp > to go directly from Apache to your > Restlet app. > Would that be an option? Simon - thanks for all your advice, i will look into t

Re: Restlets contained within servlets

Hello, Simon Reinhardt wrote: Hugh Acland wrote: So in an ideal world where one's IT budget was larger than management have given you would have a dedicated restlet 'box' serving only restlets on port 80. The problem i have is that i am constrained to one physical server which has apache on 8

Re: Restlets contained within servlets

Hugh Acland wrote: So in an ideal world where one's IT budget was larger than management have given you would have a dedicated restlet 'box' serving only restlets on port 80. The problem i have is that i am constrained to one physical server which has apache on 80, glassfish on 8080 and 8181 an

Re: Restlets contained within servlets

Simon Reinhardt koeln.de> writes: > As far as I know this is really just a deployment thing. In some environments you might already have a Servlet > Container blocking port 80 so you can't just directly bind your Restlet app to that port. Instead you need > to use the Servlet Container as a prox

Re: Restlets contained within servlets

Hi Hugh Hugh Acland wrote: Is this not a weird thing to being doing, seeing as RestLet was supposed to be a better way of doing what a lot of people were using servelets for. The only reason I can think of for doing this would be a quick'n'easy way to "deploy" a restlet onto a specific address

Restlets contained within servlets

Hi, First of all may I thank the restlet team, a really cool api. it is really helping me to get to grips with Rest. My question is this: In the tutorials and in "RestFul Webservices, Richardson & Ruby, pub: Oreilly" (a great book as well) there is an example where a Restlet is wrapped in a Se