On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Vladutzzz stoianovici_v...@yahoo.com wrote:
What would be the best way to work with a 32 MHz band resulting from USRP2?
I guess, since the minimum decimation rate is 4 (resulting in a 25 MHz
signal band), some kind of interpolation will be required or maybe
I am interested in this 2 USRPs approach since I don't have the experience
and the knowledge to start messing about inside the FPGA firmware code and
have an extra USRP2.
How would this go?
I tried looking up some info about this topic but currently gnuradio.com
seems to be down. I've read some
On 11/29/2010 01:00 PM, bob beckwith wrote:
I'm currently confronted with a sample rate vs. symbol time issue.
I noticed that the E100 announcement mentioned a flexible clocking
feature to deal with exactly this type of thing. I've been looking on
the Ettus site for more information, but
On 11/30/2010 07:04 PM, Vladutzzz wrote:
I am interested in this 2 USRPs approach since I don't have the experience
and the knowledge to start messing about inside the FPGA firmware code and
have an extra USRP2.
How would this go?
I tried looking up some info about this topic. I've read some
Hi Andis Dembovskis:
i tried to run your script, but the program stoped and get following error:
done_part_1
audio_alsa_sink[hw:0,0]: snd_pcm_hw_params failed: Descriptor de
archivo en mal estado
Traceback (most recent call last):
File programafallido.py, line 56, in module
app.tb.start()
Dear All,
I apologize for bugging people on this mailing list for this but I do
not know an alternative way.
I am looking for people located in Asia doing GNSS stuff with GNU
Radio or other SDR softwares and interested in sharing some Asian
GNSSs (e.g. QZSS) data or implementation. In return I
I'd like to get started building GNURadio for Windows, using the USRP
1, with the goal of writing some custom blocks. Do people prefer
Cygwin or MinGW style installations? Off the cuff, Cygwin looks more
straightforward. Any opinions?
Thanks in advance
Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/29/2010 03:47 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
Thanks for your reply Tom,
Have you used the version 2 digital code, yet (benchmark_tx2,
benchmark_rx2, usrp_receive_path2, etc.)? One of the things I did was
include better resampling so that you can
