Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] I hate Unity

2011-10-18 Thread Paul M. Bendixen
I have had no problems installing Gnu Radio under Kubuntu. If you already have a potent machine, try that. It gives the added bonus of being much prettier than Gnome ;) Best Regards Paul M. Bendixen 2011/10/17 Ben Hilburn b...@ettus.com N.B.: What follows is obviously all opinion: I can't

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Transmiter and receiver by using USRP1

2011-10-18 Thread waqasme
hi Marcus, I am attaching the screen shots and also block diagram of transmitter.. right now i am just trying to look for transmission of OFDM signal via usrp1. As i mentioned earlier in the fft scope plot in gnu radio i see the typical ofdm signal but on the other hand in usrp sink on the

[Discuss-gnuradio] Odd behaviur of Fractional Interpolator

2011-10-18 Thread Mattia Rizzi
I’m using gnuradio-3.3.0 with GRC. I’ve builded a graph with a Complex cosine (8Ms/s of sample rate and 1 MHz of frequency), the fractional interpolator with 12/8 value for interpolation and a FFT sink with 12MS/s of sample rate. (throttle block included). I’m expecting to see a 1MHz cosine with

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Odd behaviur of Fractional Interpolator

2011-10-18 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 18/10/11 01:38 PM, Mattia Rizzi wrote: I’m using gnuradio-3.3.0 with GRC. I’ve builded a graph with a Complex cosine (8Ms/s of sample rate and 1 MHz of frequency), the fractional interpolator with 12/8 value for interpolation and a FFT sink with 12MS/s of sample rate. (throttle block

[Discuss-gnuradio] Fw: Odd behaviur of Fractional Interpolator

2011-10-18 Thread Mattia Rizzi
Uhm, so it’s a little bit confusing. Another strange problem is that if i put a 0.64 value of interpolation, and my flow graph is a file souce-fractional interpolator-file sink, and my source file is 1GB of data, i’m expecting a 1GB*1/0.64 output filesize. But when i run the graph i get a 800MB

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Odd behaviur of Fractional Interpolator

2011-10-18 Thread Mattia Rizzi
Sorry, the filesize is my mistake. All okay now. Thank you. From: Mattia Rizzi Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 8:12 PM To: gnu radio Subject: Fw: [Discuss-gnuradio] Odd behaviur of Fractional Interpolator Uhm, so it’s a little bit confusing. Another strange problem is that if i put a 0.64

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Transmiter and receiver by using USRP1

2011-10-18 Thread Marcus D. Leech
hi Marcus, I am attaching the screen shots and also block diagram of transmitter.. right now i am just trying to look for transmission of OFDM signal via usrp1. As i mentioned earlier in the fft scope plot in gnu radio i see the typical ofdm signal but on the other hand in usrp sink on the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Transmiter and receiver by using USRP1

2011-10-18 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote: hi Marcus, I am attaching the screen shots and also block diagram of transmitter.. right now i am just trying to look for transmission of OFDM signal via usrp1. As i mentioned earlier in the fft scope plot in gnu radio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Transmiter and receiver by using USRP1

2011-10-18 Thread waqasme
Hello Marcus thanks for your reply.. Well the problem is there is not much documentation available on internet on usurp .. Also I am quite new to gnu radio and usrp1 ... I tried to play with interpolation and decimation settings but didnot get the desired ofdm signal .. I am not sure what else I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Transmiter and receiver by using USRP1

2011-10-18 Thread waqasme
Hello Marcus thanks for your reply.. Well the problem is there is not much documentation available on internet on usurp .. Also I am quite new to gnu radio and usrp1 ... I tried to play with interpolation and decimation settings but didnot get the desired ofdm signal .. I am not sure what else I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Transmiter and receiver by using USRP1

2011-10-18 Thread waqasme
Hello Marcus thanks for your reply.. Well the problem is there is not much documentation available on internet on usurp .. Also I am quite new to gnu radio and usrp1 ... I tried to play with interpolation and decimation settings but didnot get the desired ofdm signal .. I am not sure what else I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GrBlock

2011-10-18 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/18/2011 11:18 AM, Jason Bonior wrote: That worked. We will also try your next version whenever it is available on Glad to hear it works; I guess zip() cant be used with swig'd vectors on some platforms (my best guess). I reworked the code a bit to my liking and it should also fix this

[Discuss-gnuradio] Postdoctoral position open at the University of Utah

2011-10-18 Thread Neal Patwari
Dear Colleagues, The following postdoctoral position at the University of Utah is now open, and we are accepting applications. The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Sensing and Processing Across Networks (SPAN) Lab at the University of Utah (http://span.ece.utah.edu/)

[Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Nowlan, Sean
Perhaps this is the wrong place to post this error, but I'm hoping for a quick response :) I'm getting a network unreachable error on an E100 when trying to run benchmark_tx.py from the gnuradio next branch (Tom Rondeau?). Command line error, and output of uhd_usrp_probe are attached.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Perhaps this is the wrong place to post this error, but I'm hoping for a quick response J I'm getting a network unreachable error on an E100 when trying to run benchmark_tx.py from the gnuradio next branch (Tom Rondeau?). Command line error, and output of uhd_usrp_probe are attached.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Nowlan, Sean sean.now...@gtri.gatech.eduwrote: I tried with the E100’s actual address and the loopback address (127.0.0.1) and both worked. I should also say it’s a bit confusing to call the command line switch “--address” when it’s actually handling the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/18/2011 04:02 PM, Nowlan, Sean wrote: I tried with the E100's actual address and the loopback address (127.0.0.1) and both worked. I should also say it's a bit confusing to call the command line switch --address when it's actually handling the arguments the same way as

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Nowlan, Sean
Also in benchmark_tx.py I noticed that calling -m qpsk and -m bpsk still default to their differential versions unless I explicitly use the --non-differential switch. Was this intended? I assumed that specifying *psk vs. d*psk would do the right thing. Thanks, Sean P.S. - Thank you for your

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Nowlan, Sean sean.now...@gtri.gatech.eduwrote: Also in benchmark_tx.py I noticed that calling “-m qpsk” and “-m bpsk” still default to their differential versions unless I explicitly use the “--non-differential” switch. Was this intended? I assumed that

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Josh Blum j...@ettus.com wrote: On 10/18/2011 04:02 PM, Nowlan, Sean wrote: I tried with the E100's actual address and the loopback address (127.0.0.1) and both worked. I should also say it's a bit confusing to call the command line switch --address when

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Josh Blum
On 10/18/2011 04:23 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Josh Blum j...@ettus.com wrote: On 10/18/2011 04:02 PM, Nowlan, Sean wrote: I tried with the E100's actual address and the loopback address (127.0.0.1) and both worked. I should also say it's a bit confusing to

[Discuss-gnuradio] Segmentation Fault

2011-10-18 Thread Sriharsha Puranik
Hi all, I am facing Segmentation Fault error. My setup is - Ubuntu 11.04, USRP2 with WBX board, gnuradio. The scenario is - When I run uhd_fft.py, I get the following - (gdb) run /usr/local/bin/uhd_fft.py Starting program: /usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/uhd_fft.py [Thread debugging using

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] fan replacement for usrp1?

2011-10-18 Thread Mark Cetilia
ok so this has been working just fine at home, but i am actually beginning to use the usrp in performances fairly regularly, and you never know what might happen in such situations… so just to be on the safe side, i'd really rather replace the fan. unfortunately i'm not having much luck finding

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] fan replacement for usrp1?

2011-10-18 Thread Robert McGwier
Yes I have. I disconnected it. In my opinion, it is overkill for anything going on in a USRP1. YMMV, Bob On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Mark Cetilia m...@cetilia.org wrote: wondering if anybody out there has replaced their usrp1 fan with something a bit quieter? i find myself listening

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error running benchmark_tx.py from next branch

2011-10-18 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Nowlan, Sean sean.now...@gtri.gatech.eduwrote: One more thing – it looks like BITRATE refers to the USRP sample rate as opposed to the bitrate of the modulation scheme. I think this is a little confusing. Please correct me if I’m wrong with this math, using

[Discuss-gnuradio] Developers' Call, Oct. 20, 2011

2011-10-18 Thread Tom Rondeau
We will be having our monthly Developers' conference call this Thursday, Oct. 20, 2011. Time: 10 PM UTC (6 PM EDT, 3 PM PDT) SIP: sip:gnura...@digitalbazaar.com IRC: #gnuradio on freenode Agenda: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/Call20111020 Tom

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] fan replacement for usrp1?

2011-10-18 Thread Mark Cetilia
Ah good, glad to hear it's not just me… Do you run it with the top on or leave it open? Cheers, Mark -- mark.cetilia.org | mem1.com | reduxproject.com On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Robert McGwier wrote: Yes I have. I disconnected it. In my opinion, it is overkill for anything going on in