What I've *done* in the past, but I can't remember how pretty that was:
GDB has python integration (essentially, a large gdb script + python debug
infos). If you
can break at a C++ function that your python work() calls, you should be able
to e.g.
py-bt into the mother frames etc.
Cheers,
Hi Marcus,
well, I try your way and I will report if I was successful, or not.
Thank you for the hint about the new variable.
Now, I go to bed and my computer compiles the new warm 3.9.0 from source :-)
Thank you!
Tom
On 17.01.21 22:38, Marcus Müller wrote:
yep!
Seeing that you can install
Yah, there might be some kind of hack, but you're right ... since a Python
block is being exec'd via a C++-to-Python gateway it's in a no man's land
from the debugger perspective.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 4:46 PM Nicholas Long
wrote:
> So I get the fact that GNURadio is highly parallel, that is
So I get the fact that GNURadio is highly parallel, that is fine. I debug
C++ OOT blocks all the time and it is super easy, generally I make specific
effort to isolate the OOT block that I am currently working on in a test
flowgraph.
For C++ OOT blocks I just run the python top_block.py in gdb
yep!
Seeing that you can install these separately, you definitely are setting the
PYTHONPATH
environment variabl so that either version is found; do the same for
GRC_BLOCKS_PATH, so
that the two block libraries don't interfere, if you haven't already.
Then: GNU Radio 3.9 respects a new
Hi JM - I agree. And typically with knowing very little about
anything, one can jam WIFI using aircrack-ng.
But I would argue the SDR doesn't have to handshake with the receiver or
scan the network, so it may be more efficient.
But on the other hand, you may need more computing power then
Hi all,
I installed 3.8.2 and 3.9.0RC0 on my system (Debian 11 testing).
Both instances are running well but I want to distinguish/separate the
files which are opened when I start GRC. At the moment 3.8.2 is opening
file a + b and when I start 3.9.0, the same files are opened. Instead of
this I
Hi Paul - you need to post your grc file, version of gnuradio, version
of gr-osmosdr and which operating system you're using.
These people good - but they can't read your mind.
And I would recommend using the word "transmit" instead of "jamming" -
otherwise - judging from the number of
Actually, I did make a stupid mistake in the stream-vector block -
there's no problem - it works as expected under 3.8.2.
-- Cinaed
On 1/16/21 2:36 PM, Cinaed Simson wrote:
Hi Jeff - hmm, it appears the FFT block on 3.8.2 appears it doesn't
like vectors?
-- Cinaed
On 1/16/21 1:24 PM,
Dear SDR community most likely to travel in time to save the present,
The future is not set, there is no fate but what we make for ourselves. In this
very spirit, GNU Radio 3.9 packs a whole bunch of power when it comes to
transforming the way GNU Radio and its ecosytem can be developed in the
Hello Derek,
I agree with you. I am trying to make a jammer to be able to detect it
afterwards. The idea is to use machine learning to be able to detect a jammer
with gnuradio by using a trained model.
De : Aditya Arun Kumar
À : Robert Heerekop
Sujet : Re: Jamming the WiFi channel
Date
I mean really why don't you just google stuff lol and end it.
Jamming is illegal, testing your network it's not so don't jam others and
you are fine. Don't jam your router with high transmitting power stay as
close to your router 1 meter so you don't affect others and and you are
good to go.
Hi Jean,
So the attacks against wireless systems are not only Jamming. Typically
wireless attacks can be broadly categorized into 4 types (Jamming,
Spoofing, Relaying, and PHY reversing). Yeah, you're right, the military
does pay you for building these kinds of systems and this is rather an
We might hide or we might discuss ... jamming systems are less than 10 euros on
amazon [0]
for any script-kiddie to play with including myself [1]. Why anyone one would
want to
implement this in SDR rather than a NE555+VCO is beyond my understanding by why
not ...
we even got to reverse
Hi Derek,
Yeah, I accept all the things, after all, I have to, as I tend to wireless
systems and their security and some more stuff with regards to radios and
SDR and things. But what I suggest is that we guys start a separate
application/discussion area for these kinds of things (because I
To my humble opinion, this is simply not allowed and must therefore from a
moral point-a-view not be promoted.
Op zo 17 jan. 2021 16:29 schreef Aditya Arun Kumar <
adityaarunkumar...@gmail.com>:
> On a serious note, I know that all of us know how to build a jammer, in
> case of questions like
Hi Aditya,
This is a good question and one where in the end the person operating
the transmitter is responsible for ensuring that they operate legally.
Many questions to the mailing list are either explicitly or possibly
related to wireless communications systems and GNU Radio gets used
Building a jammer is one thing. For the sake of just academics building a
jammer against a specific mac address on a specific channel.
This would help in demodulation techniques, device identification, and tx out
controls.
I am not saying this is even ethical, but in the case of purely
On a serious note, I know that all of us know how to build a jammer, in
case of questions like this how do we deal with it?
I mean I can do both sides, in the spirit of sharing the knowledge I think
that someone should tell the person who is doing it on how to build a
jammer (in this case) or
20 matches
Mail list logo
