[Discuss-gnuradio] gr-sounder in GNU Radio 3.5

Hello, I was just asking myself, why gr-sounder isn't contained in GNU Radio 3.5 any more. Does anybody know the reason? Thanks. Best regards, Daniel ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/disc

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Added functionality for pre and post samples to burst tagger

Am 23.12.2011 um 17:04 schrieb Tom Rondeau: > Hi Daniel, > Sorry for not responding before; just lost track. I really wanted to thank > you for putting this together and offering it to the community. That's really > great! I plan on looking this over soon. > > Tom Hi Tom, thanks for your resp

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Added functionality for pre and post samples to burst tagger

Hi, I have made some improvements to my code at GitHub: - Created GRC xml files for the modified burst tagger and the existing tagged file sink - Added a tagged message sink, which is based on the existing tagged file sink - Added Python QA code for the burst tagger and the tagged message sink

[Discuss-gnuradio] Added functionality for pre and post samples to burst tagger

Hi, I have made some modifications to the existing burst tagger in the GNU Radio source code. It is now able to specify an amount of pre and post samples, which are additionally tagged before and after the tag signal. I have put my changes on my GitHub account, which is: https://bar...@github

[Discuss-gnuradio] Bug in 'gr_tagged_file_sink.cc'

Hi, I found a bug in the 'gr_tagged_file_sink.cc' file during my work on a burst detection. Line 203 should be changed to: 203 int count = fwrite (&inbuf[d_itemsize*idx], d_itemsize, noutput_items-idx, d_handle); The original code was: 202 if(d_state == IN_BURST) { 203 int count = fwrite

[Discuss-gnuradio] QAM demodulation state

Hi. I would like to use the Python package "packet_utils" for packet-oriented transmission in combination with a QAM modulation scheme. I figured out, that currently in GNU Radio no QAM demodulation is implemented. However I read in this mailing list, that a few people are working on it or did

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 25 MS/s at 16 bits I/Q vs. gr.sizeof_gr_complex

16:24 schrieb Alexander Chemeris: > Daniel, > > What hardware setup do you use to achieve 25MS/s? I wasn't able to > get stable connection with more then 16MS/s, and even at 16MS/s I had > drops. > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 17:04, Daniel Bartel > wrote: >> Hello

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 25 MS/s at 16 bits I/Q vs. gr.sizeof_gr_complex

>> Hello, >> >> I was wondering about a little conflict concerning the sizes of the data >> types in GNU Radio. >> >> The UHD driver sends 16 bits I, 16 bits Q samples over the ethernet >> interface at 25 MS/s and the return value of "gr.sizeof_gr_complex" is 8 >> bytes (64 bits). >> How does

[Discuss-gnuradio] 25 MS/s at 16 bits I/Q vs. gr.sizeof_gr_complex

Hello, I was wondering about a little conflict concerning the sizes of the data types in GNU Radio. The UHD driver sends 16 bits I, 16 bits Q samples over the ethernet interface at 25 MS/s and the return value of "gr.sizeof_gr_complex" is 8 bytes (64 bits). How does this actually work? I have

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Assertion "imu >= 0" failed on random times

Hi Tom, thanks for your explanation and sorry for my late reply. > What block are you using to call the interpolator? What values is the block > working off? If it's the M&M clock recovery block, it's possible that the > amplitude your input signal is too high, which is causing overly-large er

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] BER in bert- example

>>> But from my tests I see that >>> 1 bit error in -> 7 bit errors out >>> 2 consecutive bit errors in -> 2 errors in the output >>> 3 consecutive bit errors in -> 7 errors in the output >>> 4 consecutive bit errors in -> 4 errors in the output >>> ... >>> And so forth up to 7 (Length of the lfsr)

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] anyone know sine wave or square wave external clock is better for usrp

Hello. > I need to use external clock on usrp, there are two kinds of clock: sine wave > and square wave. which > is better for usrp? I used for my N210 a square wave signal, because it was suggested on http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/manual/html/index.html Daniel ___

[Discuss-gnuradio] Assertion "imu >= 0" failed on random times

Hello, in the program I am currently working on, I sometimes get the following error messsage: python: gri_mmse_fir_interpolator_cc.cc:66: gr_complex gri_mmse_fir_interpolator_cc::interpolate(const gr_complex*, float): Zusicherung »imu >= 0« nicht erfüllt. Abgebrochen It seems like the assert

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Implementing digital-bert with UHD

and make it a little bit 'cleaner'. Afterwards I will put it in a public repository, so at this moment I can only post some code pieces, if needed. Kind regards, Daniel Bartel ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Implementing digital-bert with UHD

Thanks for your reply... > Perhaps you are in a particularly bad multipath environment? Although I agree > that changing the power should have more than a tenth of a dB effect on the > SNR. Have you tried turning it down? Or really, can your plot the spectrum at > the receiver and verify that t