Is this comment relevant for the Tx only
or for both TX and Rx ?
> Just one minor correction from what I said before. The way you show the
> multipliers and the NCO is not quite correct. It is doing a full
> complex
> multiplication. The CORDIC does the NCO and the multiplication
> together.
>
Quoting Achilleas Anastasopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to understand exactly what kind of SP
> is going on the Rx and Tx path of the FPGA and basic
> Rx/Tx.
>
> I am attaching an eps file (and an xfig file) with a hypothesized block
> diagram that is the result of all th
Quoting "Damien B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Matt,
> I came up with the same diagram with a few difference. Could you confirm them
> ?
>
> - the cordic stage in TX chain is disable (V0.8)
>
> - DA converter can work at 128MS/s but the txsync is muxing at 32MS/s
> for each channel
Sort of. The A
Hi Matt,
I came up with the same diagram with a few difference. Could you confirm them ?
- the cordic stage in TX chain is disable (V0.8)
- DA converter can work at 128MS/s but the txsync is muxing at 32MS/s
for each channel
Thanks, cheers
Damien
On 4/19/05, Matt Ettus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Quoting Achilleas Anastasopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to understand exactly what kind of SP
> is going on the Rx and Tx path of the FPGA and basic
> Rx/Tx.
>
> I am attaching an eps file (and an xfig file) with a hypothesized block
> diagram that is the result
Dear all,
I am trying to understand exactly what kind of SP
is going on the Rx and Tx path of the FPGA and basic
Rx/Tx.
I am attaching an eps file (and an xfig file) with a hypothesized block
diagram that is the result of all the information I have
collected on the website and the discussions.
Can
