: firasmail2...@yahoo.com
Data: 06/02/2010 14.34
A: gnuradioDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Ogg: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Ettus Research News
What is important to us is to keep providing the SDR hardware at lowest
possible prices and keep developing your
products.
Presentaci un amico! Invita i tuoi amici
On 8 February 2010 13:21, Alberto Trentadue albtrenta...@tiscali.it wrote:
Hi
I assume that the objective for a GNU HW manufacturer should be to keep
providing the SDR hardware at lowest
possible prices and keep developing products + UNDER GPL.
I know no big company with these objectives.
Hi,
I want to share my 2 cents:
1) Congratulation Matt.
2) Matt (and Ettus Research) has gave much to SDR open source community and
deserve more funding.
3) May be things (for gnuradio community) will not be as it was before NI
announcement, but one should not be selfish and let others
Today, as the next step in the growth of our company, we are very proud to
announce that Ettus Research has been acquired by National Instruments
Corporation (NI, http://www.ni.com). NI was founded in 1976 to transform
the way engineers and scientists around the world design, prototype, and
Ettus Research LLC was founded in 2004 to produce high quality, low cost
software radio systems, and bring these capabilities to everyone. In
the last five and a half years this company, which started in a garage,
has shipped thousands of products to users in over 67 countries. Those
Congrats all at Ettus research! Looking forward to the future.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ettus m...@ettus.com
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:01:25
To: gnuradioDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Ettus Research News
Ettus Research LLC was founded in 2004 to produce
So I guess I should be the first one to ask:
How will this affect the GPL and Open Sourceness of the USRP project?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ettus m...@ettus.com
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:01:25
To: gnuradioDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Ettus Research News
I have questions about the UHD. What license will be applied to it? Will
the sources be provided or binary only? (I suspect sources, but want to be
sure) And will the UHD be taking the place of libusrp2.so?
Also, more general, from the perspective of the user (me) what will change?
From the
Don Fanning wrote:
So I guess I should be the first one to ask:
How will this affect the GPL and Open Sourceness of the USRP project?
More specifically, I see the pdfs of the schematics [1], but is there
location to pull the .sch and .pcb files (or proprietary format
equivalents) from? I
Heh... You know I wondered the exact same thing a few weeks ago. Matt
informed me that the .PCB files were never released. I did find a copy of
the gEDA files used to make the schematic drawings for the USRP from a older
GNURadio mirror. So much of what I'm seeing from Matt has been a move away
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Don Fanning d...@00100100.net wrote:
Heh... You know I wondered the exact same thing a few weeks ago. Matt
informed me that the .PCB files were never released. I did find a copy of
the gEDA files used to make the schematic drawings for the USRP from a older
Am I denying that he shouldn't be paid? No.
He has done a great bit of work and much congratulations to him for taking
his business to the next level.
I'm not going to get all awestruck about the guy. No one is worthy of
that. He may be your friend, but this is just business. Nothing
Don,
If anyone out there that is actually a part of this community feels the
way you do, I'd love to hear it. But you just showed up and started
making accusations. I've been contributing to GNU Radio for nine years
now. I'll answer your questions for the sake of everyone else, though.
NI has a reputation for fiercely protecting their patents. They sued The
MathWorks
over Simulink in a lengthy and hard-fought case and won in a jury trial in
2003.
This is why, to this day, you can't change source block parameters via dialog
box or
other visual or control panel means while
On 02/05/2010 12:31 PM, devin kelly wrote:
I have questions about the UHD. What license will be applied to it?
Will the sources be provided or binary only? (I suspect sources, but
want to be sure) And will the UHD be taking the place of libusrp2.so?
The UHD code will ALL be open source.
Don-
I'm not going to get all awestruck about the guy. No one is worthy of
that. He
may be your friend, but this is just business. Nothing personal.
After seeing 100s of engineers and projects and companies go by in my 30 years
of
engineering, I can say you probably ought to be awestruck
Hello,
Hm, I discoverd it is like Free as in freedom not like free beer. :-(
2010/2/5 Tom Rondeau trondeau1...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Don Fanning d...@00100100.net wrote:
Heh... You know I wondered the exact same thing a few weeks ago. Matt
informed me that the .PCB
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Matt Ettus m...@ettus.com wrote:
Don,
If anyone out there that is actually a part of this community feels the way
you do, I'd love to hear it. But you just showed up and started making
accusations. I've been contributing to GNU Radio for nine years now.
Forget to mention:
I have found an invitation paper from NI in my Mailbox today about some NI
product presentation.
So would be great if I find sometime a NI invitation about a GNURADIO
presentation in my area. :-)
yours faithful
Josef Vukovic
___
Congratulations to Ettus. Hope to see more and more nice productions
Matt Ettus wrote:
Ettus Research LLC was founded in 2004 to produce high quality, low cost
software radio systems, and bring these capabilities to everyone. In
the last five and a half years this company, which
On 02/05/2010 04:59 PM, Don Fanning wrote:
Am I denying that he shouldn't be paid? No.
He has done a great bit of work and much congratulations to him for
taking his business to the next level.
I'm not going to get all awestruck about the guy. No one is worthy
of that. He may be your
Marcus D. Leech wrote:
On 02/05/2010 04:59 PM, Don Fanning wrote:
Am I denying that he shouldn't be paid? No.
He has done a great bit of work and much congratulations to him for
taking his business to the next level.
I'm not going to get all awestruck about the guy. No one is worthy
of
Ettus publishes the schematics. They are sometimes out of date but
not hard to figure out if you have an actual board in front of you
and take a little time. What the BOM? Look at a schematic and a
board and figure it out. It's not like anyone is trying to stop you.
You want layout
Don-
But what happens
when your project won't fit into the square form factor? What if you
have this great idea but can only fit into the form factor of say a cell
phone... then what? I'm not the only one with the same idea... Look at
the beagleboard guys doing their USRP work.
The
David Burgess wrote:
You want layout files? You think there's something wrong with Ettus
withholding them? Fix the situation. The design is free in the sense
that you are free to hire your own engineer to make your own layout
from Ettus' free schematics. Then after you pay for that you
Matt has never been forced to say that All USRP schematics (gEDA and PDF),
all daughterboard schematics (gEDA and PDF), all daughterboard PCB design
files, and daughterboard electrical and mechanical specs are available. You
can find them on the download page. http://www.ettus.com/faq#pcb
On 02/05/2010 08:17 PM, Don Fanning wrote:
Good for you to support the project at an early stage. But what
happens when your project won't fit into the square form factor? What
if you have this great idea but can only fit into the form factor of
say a cell phone... then what? I'm not the
All,
Sorry for the sh*tstorm... :-(
Jason wrote:
Don Fanning wrote:
So I guess I should be the first one to ask:
How will this affect the GPL and Open Sourceness of the USRP project?
More specifically, I see the pdfs of the schematics [1], but is there
location to pull the .sch and
28 matches
Mail list logo
