On 09.04.2008 18:08, Eric Blossom wrote:
I have no interest in supporting an interface to MATLAB, or any other
proprietary software for that matter. I'd be much more interested in
working with Octave, or better yet, working up an excellent
Why making a difference? Most code is compatible
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:16:44PM +0200, Moeller wrote:
On 09.04.2008 18:08, Eric Blossom wrote:
I have no interest in supporting an interface to MATLAB, or any other
proprietary software for that matter. I'd be much more interested in
working with Octave, or better yet, working up an
On 04.08.2010 19:35, Eric Blossom wrote:
Why making a difference? Most code is compatible between Octave and Matlab.
Even Matlab C++ MEX functions compile very well in Octave.
The Octave scripts in gnuradio are not working in Matlab, because they use
Octave-specials (comments as ## instead of
Pu, Di [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I
could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am
wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly
without GNU radio. Thank you very much!
(This isn't
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Greg Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There has been some recent discussion about using Free software that has
matlab-like features, like octave and freemat.
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/
http://freemat.sourceforge.net/
I did some poking around the
Greg-
I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I
could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am
wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly
without GNU radio. Thank you very much!
(This isn't entirely directed at you -
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Brower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I understand completely your viewpoint. However, let me point out that one
of your key objectives should be to
increase popularity of GNU Radio software. One way to do this is to
encourage and support GNU Radio
PROTECTED]
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:03 AM
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I could
enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am wondering
whether
Greg-
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Brower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I understand completely your viewpoint. However, let me point out that one
of your key objectives should be to
increase popularity of GNU Radio software. One way to do this is to
encourage and support
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeff Brower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg-
On days that I'm in philosophical mode, I completely agree. But the reality
is that MATLAB is far more widely used
than Octave. MATLAB is at the core of the commercial and academic RF
community, Octave is not.
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:38:23AM -0500, Jeff Brower wrote:
Greg-
I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I
could enable the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am
wondering whether it is possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly
without GNU
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jeff Brower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there is no arguing with success, and MATLAB is highly successful. For
GNU Radio to succeed it should gracefully
navigate the RF community real world, and MATLAB is a key part of that.
The pragmatic approach involves
I think the problem is that there are basically 2 separate cultures
here. There are those coming from the CS and free software world, and
those coming from the radio, engineering, academic, industry, hardware,
etc. worlds. Those in the free software world often don't understand
how truly
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jeff Brower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there is no arguing with success, and MATLAB is highly successful.
For GNU Radio to succeed it should gracefully
navigate the RF community real
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:38:08AM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
I think the problem is that there are basically 2 separate cultures here.
There are those coming from the CS and free software world, and those
coming from the radio, engineering, academic, industry, hardware, etc.
worlds.
Matt-
I think the problem is that there are basically 2 separate cultures
here. There are those coming from the CS and free software world, and
those coming from the radio, engineering, academic, industry, hardware,
etc. worlds. Those in the free software world often don't understand
how
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Brower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Eric, well said. My one exception is your reasoning based on
what
features MATLAB and/or GNU Radio have or don't have. If you ask colleagues
why do
you need to use MATLAB they will say because it's what
application.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gregory Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:42 PM
To: Jeff Brower
Cc: Matt Ettus; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Eric Blossom wrote:
I have no interest in supporting an interface to MATLAB, or any other
proprietary software for that matter. I'd be much more interested in
working with Octave, or better yet, working up an excellent
interface to scipy. Just because EE's are trained in MATLAB, doesn't
mean
to GNU Radio.
-Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gregory Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:42 PM
To: Jeff Brower
Cc: Matt Ettus; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Matlab interface to USRP
On Wed
Hello all,
I am trying to figure out the Matlab interface to USRP. Although I could enable
the communications between Matlab and GNU Radio, I am wondering whether it is
possible to make Matlab hook to USRP directly without GNU radio. Thank you very
much!
21 matches
Mail list logo
