Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Patrik Tast
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost! On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote: If you're in a position to listen for the beacon packets of NanoSail-D, some of the details are here: http://nanosaild.engr.scu.edu/dashboard.htm Wish my SBRAC

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Philip Heron
Hi, On 22/01/11 18:32, Patrik Tast wrote: Sumthing is fundamentally wrong how I/we do it. I guess it could be LHCP? Perhaps someone (who speak English) could query NASA on howtos? I believe NanoSail-D's battery is now completely drained, and is now silent. -Phil

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Hi Alex /Marcus All I have exactly the same result as Alexandur (not only once) I guess we used almost the same RCP antenna http://www.poes-weather.com/~patrik/AO-51/ Yesterday nite NanoSail passed FI at zenith, I could not hear anything from it (once the signal jumped but staid only for 2

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Alexandru Csete
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote: Hi Alex /Marcus All I have exactly the same result as Alexandur (not only once) I guess we used almost the same RCP antenna http://www.poes-weather.com/~patrik/AO-51/ Yesterday nite NanoSail passed FI at zenith, I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-22 Thread Patrik Tast
...@gmail.com To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 21:28 Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost! On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote: Hi Alex /Marcus All I have exactly the same result as Alexandur (not only

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-21 Thread Patrik Tast
Hi All, Is it linear polarized, if so which? If not, then which circular polarisation? Patrik - Original Message - From: Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 5:35 Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-21 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/21/2011 01:54 PM, Patrik Tast wrote: Hi All, Is it linear polarized, if so which? If not, then which circular polarisation? Patrik I don't know, but this, from the Nansat-D mission dashboard, is not very hopeful: STATUS: NanoSail-D ejected on 1/17/11 at approximately 1900 PST.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-21 Thread Patrik Tast
and the usrp_nbfm_rcv.py in examples Thanks, Patrik - Original Message - From: Marcus D. Leech To: Patrik Tast Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 21:07 Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost! On 01/21/2011 01:54 PM, Patrik Tast wrote

[Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
If you're in a position to listen for the beacon packets of NanoSail-D, some of the details are here: http://nanosaild.engr.scu.edu/dashboard.htm Wish my SBRAC dish was fully operational. I'd actually be able to *track* it--I've got 400MHz feeds, and a WBX-based receive chain. So much

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-20 Thread Alexandru Csete
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote: If you're in a position to listen for the beacon packets of NanoSail-D, some of the details are here: http://nanosaild.engr.scu.edu/dashboard.htm Wish my SBRAC dish was fully operational.  I'd actually be able to

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NanoSail-D turns out isn't lost!

2011-01-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/20/2011 08:35 PM, Alexandru Csete wrote: I tried earlier today with a handheld Arrow II yagi connected directly to WBX. I could hear it but it was too weak to decode. A bigger yagi should give sufficient signal. In case you receive, it is very easy to decode the telemetry. It uses 1200