Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2014-07-17 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 03/07/2014 18:41, Bill Dailey wrote: > Can you explain this a little. I tried that the other night and > couldn't get it to do anything. I suspect I am setting the bandwidth > incorrectly or something. I tried that pi/200 - 2pi/100 thing. Hello Bill, first, I recommend you to address your repl

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2014-07-03 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > On 27/06/2014 20:51, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > > This question is not strictly GNURadio related, but I hope to find > > people more knowledgeable than me here... > > > > I have a signal x(t) at a carrier frequency fc which is phase modula

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2014-07-01 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 27/06/2014 20:51, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > This question is not strictly GNURadio related, but I hope to find > people more knowledgeable than me here... > > I have a signal x(t) at a carrier frequency fc which is phase modulated. > The phase modulation itself is modulated at a modulation freq

[Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2014-06-27 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello, This question is not strictly GNURadio related, but I hope to find people more knowledgeable than me here... I have a signal x(t) at a carrier frequency fc which is phase modulated. The phase modulation itself is modulated at a modulation frequency fmod: x(t) = Eo cos(2 pi fc t + m(t))

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-11 Thread William Cox
Could you elaborate on this statement? BTW, the fine point above is that you cannot set theta_hat(t)=arg(r(t)), > because this assignment does NOT satisfy the BW constraints of your initial > signal theta(t) or theta_hat(t). Are you saying that theta_hat(t) should be quantized, and therefore not

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-10 Thread Mikael Olofsson
Which, of course is completely true. /Mikael Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote: Just to make a note on the more theoretical aspect of this problem: If you want to avoid all complications arising from the discontinuous arctan, you can (and technically/theoretically you should) work with the act

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-07 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
Just to make a note on the more theoretical aspect of this problem: If you want to avoid all complications arising from the discontinuous arctan, you can (and technically/theoretically you should) work with the actual incoming signal r(t)=exp(j theta(t)) + n(t) and its hypothesized estimate s_

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-07 Thread Mikael Olofsson
Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote: arctan (imag(out)/real(out)) plus some filtering to remove out of band noise (it would be nice also to make sure you avoid discontinuities inherent in the arctan function)... I would like to add that you should use four quadrant arctan, i.e. add or subtract pi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-06 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
arctan (imag(out)/real(out)) plus some filtering to remove out of band noise (it would be nice also to make sure you avoid discontinuities inherent in the arctan function)... Achilleas ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https:

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-05 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 10/05/2011 05:05 PM, Phelps Williams wrote: Excuse my ignorance but I need this spelled out for me. I am trying to come up with a phase demodulator to effectively perform the opposite function as the gr_phase_modulator_fc class. According to the code this is effectively doing output=comple

[Discuss-gnuradio] Phase demodulation

2011-10-05 Thread Phelps Williams
Excuse my ignorance but I need this spelled out for me. I am trying to come up with a phase demodulator to effectively perform the opposite function as the gr_phase_modulator_fc class. According to the code this is effectively doing output=complex(cos(in*sensitivity), sin(in*sensitivity)). Is th