Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP Structure

2015-09-09 Thread Chris Kuethe
This isn't a relevant concern for general purpose / experimental hardware like bladerf, hackrf, or usrp hanging off a PC. They're intended to be user programmable. If someone roots your box, they can replace your FPGA image, usb, or microcontroller firmware ... but to what end? The platform is

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP Structure

2015-09-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 09/09/2015 08:24 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: This isn't a relevant concern for general purpose / experimental hardware like bladerf, hackrf, or usrp hanging off a PC. They're intended to be user programmable. If someone roots your box, they can replace your FPGA image, usb, or microcontroller

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP Structure

2015-09-09 Thread mleech
Since most SDRs out there have fully reconfigurable-by-the-end-user FPGA and firmware images, I don't think the notion of "compromise" has much meaning in this context, further because access to the devices is freely available to ordinary user-level processes, they can ask the radio to do

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP Structure

2015-09-09 Thread Logan Wu
Hello, Recently I read a paper on cognitive radio security (Secure reconfiguration of software-defined radio). It highlights that the operating system of cognitive radio node may be compromised as the malware can exploit software vulnerabilities. I am wondering if the FPGA and firmware are part