Hi
Thanks to Achilleas for his kind advices.
In fact my personal notation (issued for my lecture to master
students) is conflicting with some other notation found in the
literature (may be my books are outdated, I've been teaching this
for 35
Hi Crostophe,
thank you for this wonderful tutorial.
You may want to use the more standard terms:
"pre-envelope" m_+(t) = m(t) + j \hat{m}(t)
(ie, the signal you currently denote as \tilde{m}(t))
"complex-envelope", \tilde{m}(t)
(for the signal you currently denote as m^{bb}(t) )
thank you
Beautiful!
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:50 PM Christophe Seguinot <
christophe.segui...@orange.fr> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Two months ago we had long discussions about why GNURadio was using
> complex signal, and what really is such a signal.
>
> We talked about 'spinning dancer' 'sampling the data twice',
Hi
Two months ago we had long discussions about why GNURadio was
using complex signal, and what really is such a signal.
We talked about 'spinning dancer' 'sampling the data twice', and
using "dogs as local oscillators". It was obvious that we need
