ython bindings" is a pretty
strong statement.
Thanks for the input.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Discuss-gnuradio
On Behalf Of Marcus Müller
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 11:20 AM
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: QA Tests: Python vs C++
Hi Jeff,
since all the data handli
Hi Jeff,
since all the data handling is done in C++ land in GNU Radio anyways, the only difference
in test performance is when the Python code takes longer to evaluate the the result of
some flow graph.
For example:
if you write a test case where the data from a vector sink is compared to
Jeff,
When tests are done in C++, they also must be compiled, which adds to the
overall gnuradio compilation time. In-tree the c++ tests are reserved
mainly for testing the really low level like buffers.
I agree with you that an all c++ target makes debugging easy, but you can
launch the python
I started writing some QA tests which were missing for some blocks I'm working
on (in maint-3.9). I decided to compare using Python vs using C++ when
building new tests. When I started looking into the C++ tests, it seems that
there are not a lot of examples around, so I started wondering why
