On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 01:43:41PM +0100, Martin Braun wrote:
[code]
Here's what I don't understand: the state for the MA (as for all
filters) is saved implicitly in the history. However, in this special
case, the state is simply one scalar value (saved in 'sum'). The way
this is
Whoops,
forget about skipping the history(), of course it couldn't work.
However, by adding a state buffer to the class, the first for() loop
can be skipped. For long MAs, this would save some multiplications and
only increase memory usage by one item_size.
The reason we don't do that is that
