On 03/15/2010 01:51 AM, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
Hi,
Both SR-DVB and OpenBTS wrote their own code from scratch,
even though major parts of the computation could have been handled by
GNU Radio processing blocks. Why?
OpenBTS makes uses of inband signaling to maintain strict TX/RX sync,
AFAIK
Hi,
Both SR-DVB and OpenBTS wrote their own code from scratch,
even though major parts of the computation could have been handled by
GNU Radio processing blocks. Why?
OpenBTS makes uses of inband signaling to maintain strict TX/RX sync,
AFAIK this is not supported in the standard blocks.
Dear John,
let me first thank you for your interest in our work upon SR-DVB and,
particularly, MA.
I consider it and the questions you asked us a great honor.
This said, well:
for MA paper. We're striving to get the first articles on paper
somewhere around September/October 2010. We will do all
Hi everybody,
here are the links to 3 youtube videos covering
SR-DVB Presentation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfvLCh8ADxk
SR-DVB Demo + MA (Memory Acceleration) Intro
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxXW4Gya918
Conclusions and first question
Hi Vincenzo - Can you also provide links to your papers, both the
WSR10 one and whatever you can on your MA technique? Enquiring minds
will want to know more about MA ... Thanks! - MLD
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Vincenzo, I read your new teaser on Memory Acceleration. Time/memory
tradeoffs, yes, have done that. Recursive table aggregation, OK.
Algorithm segmentation, sure. I am still looking forward to the real
paper, when it gets released.
But I have a structural question. We've now seen two major
Hi Michael,
links to WSR10 paper and presentation slides are embedded into the
videos from my previous post.
Believe me, I would love to post the full MA paper right now.
I will do immediately after being allowed to do so by peer reviewing /
publication process.
I will do all possible efforts to
