Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-20 Thread Dan CaJacob
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Dan CaJacob > wrote: > > Hey Tom, > > > > The block worked fine with the right symblic name passed! The amp is > > getting PTTed now in 3.7 Thanks for your help with this! > > Great! > > > > It still seems w

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-17 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: > Hey Tom, > > The block worked fine with the right symblic name passed! The amp is > getting PTTed now in 3.7 Thanks for your help with this! Great! > It still seems weird that the USRP Sink symbolic name was formatted > differently, though

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-14 Thread Dan CaJacob
Hey Tom, The block worked fine with the right symblic name passed! The amp is getting PTTed now in 3.7 Thanks for your help with this! It still seems weird that the USRP Sink symbolic name was formatted differently, though. Also, would it be possible to automatically register symbolic name alia

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-10 Thread Dan CaJacob
Hey Tom, We've been working on this, but we ran into a snag. We couldn't seem to look up the usrp sink block's key. Other blocks could be looked up with the keys we expected, just not the uhd sink. I just un-commented a print statement in block_registry.cc so that we could see how each block ac

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-07 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: > Hey Tom, > > Here's some more detail into our problem. > > When running the flowgraph, we get the following error: > > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sq/sq_swig.py", line 679, in > make > return _sq_swig.usrp_pa_control_make(*

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-06 Thread Dan CaJacob
Thanks Tom, No problem. I hope you and the rest of the community had relaxing holidays! I hope to have some better info for you by tomorrow, if not before. Another way to look at this is: does it make sense to keep doing things this way? Is there a better way to reference the downstream USRP a

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2014-01-06 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote: > We are upgrading some of our custom blocks for 3.7 and have run into a snag. > Our 3.6 era blocks included one that PTTed an external amplifier based on > stream tags. The IO was generated from the extra GPIO available on the WBX. > One of the

[Discuss-gnuradio] Passing a USRP pointer

2013-12-21 Thread Dan CaJacob
We are upgrading some of our custom blocks for 3.7 and have run into a snag. Our 3.6 era blocks included one that PTTed an external amplifier based on stream tags. The IO was generated from the extra GPIO available on the WBX. One of the inputs to the block was a reference to the USRP sink downs