On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Tom Rondeau t...@trondeau.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Dan CaJacob dan.caja...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey Tom,
The block worked fine with the right symblic name passed! The amp is
getting PTTed now in 3.7 Thanks for your help with this!
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Dan CaJacob dan.caja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Tom,
The block worked fine with the right symblic name passed! The amp is
getting PTTed now in 3.7 Thanks for your help with this!
Great!
It still seems weird that the USRP Sink symbolic name was formatted
Hey Tom,
The block worked fine with the right symblic name passed! The amp is
getting PTTed now in 3.7 Thanks for your help with this!
It still seems weird that the USRP Sink symbolic name was formatted
differently, though.
Also, would it be possible to automatically register symbolic name
Hey Tom,
We've been working on this, but we ran into a snag. We couldn't seem to
look up the usrp sink block's key. Other blocks could be looked up with
the keys we expected, just not the uhd sink. I just un-commented a print
statement in block_registry.cc so that we could see how each block
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Dan CaJacob dan.caja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Tom,
Here's some more detail into our problem.
When running the flowgraph, we get the following error:
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sq/sq_swig.py, line 679, in
make
return
Thanks Tom,
No problem. I hope you and the rest of the community had relaxing
holidays! I hope to have some better info for you by tomorrow, if not
before.
Another way to look at this is: does it make sense to keep doing things
this way? Is there a better way to reference the downstream USRP
