Thanks for the tip. I also discovered that I can give
a message=yes option along with make which prints
out the exact command being given by make for each
line. It's less verbose than make -n, while being
quite informative.
Thanks for your tip anyway, it will be quite useful to
me.
DD
---
something like 'make -n' ?
caution: it's would be extremely verbose, too much in fact, but maybe you
could output it to a file and study the file
- Original Message -
From: Diptansu Das [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:03 PM
Subject: can
the other day I was trying to use the -Wno-import flags and someone told me
to use the ADDITIONAL_OBJCFLAGS variable.
Now I am at loss to add some flags to the link stage.
I wonder is there any documentation on standart variable use bu the GNUstep
makeflie system?
Or which file should I look
On 2005-04-24 05:49:37 +0100 Sheldon Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a couple of naming standards in use. The trouble is that standard
GNU form conflicts with standard NeXT and Apple forms.
For ObjC methods the standard is verbClause or typeInitialiser.
For ObjC classes the standard is
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 2005-04-24 05:49:37 +0100 Sheldon Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW... I believe that better specification of coding standards is a
good thing. I don't have strong feelings either way for most of the
issues mentioned. But I think we would get a lot more
--- Sheldon Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some things which don't seem clear from the coding standards.
This has lead to things being done differently in various places. I
think it is a good idea to clean up and standardise.
Hence, I'm proposing a number of
I think we should also be clear that dictionary or dict is preferred
over d. Except for mathematical function implementations single or
double character identifiers are a bad idea.
Ahm ... yes, single or double character identifiers are very difficult to
search/replace, and are generally
On 2005-04-24 05:49:37 +0100 Sheldon Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some things which don't seem clear from the coding standards.
This has lead to things being done differently in various places. I think
it
is a good idea to clean up and standardise.
Hence, I'm proposing a number of
Diptansu Das wrote:
I have become intersted in the GNUstep environment,
so I installed it in a Cygwin environment sometime
back. I have installed make, base, gui and back, along
with gnustep-objc and ffcall. I wanted to use libart
as the backend. Everything compiles nicely, but when i
start even
Hi all
First post to the GNUstep lists.
I am developing some mathematical code on OS X using just the Foundation
classes (and none of the Apple extensions like ObjC++ and exceptions). This
code is run from the command line with no GUI, so all I will need from
GNUstep is the 'base'
How would support for files greater than 2GB be opened.
I'd like to be able to use mplayer.app on large file?
Later
Jonathan
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Just updated and built 10 minutes ago:
Making all for tool gnustep_sndd...
Compiling file gsnd.m ...
gsnd.m:24:43: portaudio/pa_common/portaudio.h: No such file or directory
gsnd.m:273: error: parse error before '*' token
gsnd.m:273: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `pStream'
Oops...
/me goes to download/install portaudio!!
GJC
--- Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just updated and built 10 minutes ago:
Making all for tool gnustep_sndd...
Compiling file gsnd.m ...
gsnd.m:24:43: portaudio/pa_common/portaudio.h: No such file or directory
thank for the reply.
anyway as it looks quite unpromising yesterday, after a few twitch of the
code, I was able to get rid of CoreData and OmniStuff, so no worry !!
- Original Message -
From: Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 1:13 PM
14 matches
Mail list logo
