On 2005-05-08 22:14:51 +0100 Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you advocate for the parts of the API which were introduced
after OpenStep, but before MacOS-X, and the parts of the API which were in
OpenStep but were removed before MacOS-X was released?
It should be obvious, but I
On 2005-05-09 03:52:10 +0100 Sheldon Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Way
===
The headers currently have a few #ifdef to control which prototypes are
visable to a build. Hence you can check if your program calls APIs which
aren't available.
STRICT_OPENSTEP, STRICT_MACOS_X,
Alex Perez wrote:
I think whether or not a class was introduced in OPENSTEP 4.0, 4.1, or
4.2, at this point, is completely irrelevant, and I personally am not
going to research this. Besides, we work off the OpenStep specification,
not anything else, when it comes to the original API
Sheldon Gill wrote:
This is no longer about Coding Standards so I think it's time for a new
thread...
We want to document, for each API call, which Cocoa version or GNUstep
version introduced it. Also, where applicable, which version deprecated
it and which version removed it.
Richard
First, thanks for your working on this.
I think what you are trying to do is say something along the lines
ValidFromOS xxx To:NULL
ValidFromOSVersion xxx To:NULL
ValidityStatus
ValidFromDate xxx To:NULL
As seem to have the following axes:
OS,
Hi ... nice to hear from you again ... I hope you got home from FOSDEM
without too much trouble.
On 2005-05-09 12:48:52 +0100 Gerold Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, thanks for your working on this.
I think what you are trying to do is say something along the lines
ValidFromOS xxx
On 2005-05-09 15:08:04 +0200 Richard Frith-Macdonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ... nice to hear from you again ... I hope you got home from
FOSDEM
without too much trouble.
After all the rush I had time to shop at the airport - one of the
worst snowstorms in Geneva kept the plane from
First, thanks for your working on this.
I think what you are trying to do is say something along the lines
ValidFromOS xxxTo:NULL
ValidFromOSVersion xxxTo:NULL
ValidityStatus
ValidFromDate xxxTo:NULL
I think we are talking about operating system version/release,
I've tried numerous versions of gcc and been unable to compile both
libffi and objc. However I have ffcall installed from darwinports and
am trying again.
I am runing macos 10.4.
If I build gcc using gcc-3.3.5 I get an error message that c++-filt is
not found. If I build gcc-4.0.0 source without
Le 05-05-09 à 19:07, Secret Guy a écrit :
I've tried numerous versions of gcc and been unable to compile both
libffi and objc. However I have ffcall installed from darwinports and
am trying again.
I guess that means that libffi from darwinports is broken on 10.4 ?
I am runing macos 10.4.
If I
On 2005-05-09 22:49:32 +0100 Gerold Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Though in the proof of concept code I added, I use a specific marker
'' as meaning the current release ... in a final version I would
prefer
to use a more readable marker or (better) use extra macros with only one
On 2005-05-10 01:05:46 +0100 Sheldon Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are talking about operating system version/release, and are not
considering specific dates (though I guess we could lookup dates of
various
releases).
I was thinking a separate page/pages could list releases and
12 matches
Mail list logo
