On 30 Apr 2015, at 23:11, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
> Looks like gcc 4.9 has gotten very strict about method calls on nil that
> return a structure. It has always been better to check that case, but now it
> has become a must.
This has always been the case with gcc: it will call a function with the
That would be very surprising; why would they do that?
:-)
sent from phone
On May 1, 2015 09:26, "David Chisnall" wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2015, at 23:43, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand, I find it very frustrating to see how fast they
> implemented something that we have been working
On 30 Apr 2015, at 23:43, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
> On the other hand, I find it very frustrating to see how fast they
> implemented something that we have been working on for years.
I am led to believe that Microsoft employs some full-time developers.
David
-- Sent from my IBM 1620
_
