If that is the case then why can’t we:
1) write a set of WTF classes linking to gnustep-gui? That should be our
“standard” user interface library. Also this will give rise to a WebKit fork
with GNUstep ObjC fronted and backend, or
2) Reorganize gnustep-back into CG, CA and CT libraries since
Am 13.06.2015 um 19:49 schrieb andrewkaz andrew...@gmail.com:
Anyone have a status on a GNUstep web browser?
Was checking out Mantella, the wrapper around Firefox from like 2007. I may
even be close to getting it to compile! My system has Ice weasel though, not
firefox, and not sure what
Max,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:04 AM Maxthon Chan xcvi...@me.com wrote:
If that is the case then why can’t we:
1) write a set of WTF classes linking to gnustep-gui? That should be our
“standard” user interface library. Also this will give rise to a WebKit
fork with GNUstep ObjC fronted and
Hi,
andrewkaz wrote:
Anyone have a status on a GNUstep web browser?
you hit a topic which has been discussed to death, which is quite
complex and wide-reaching. However apart from discussion there has been
only two real code attempts up to now: Berkelium by Greg and
SWK/Vespucci by Nikolaus,
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a fresh install of libobjc2, gnustep, libdispatch. I think
I've gotten ARC and dispatch_queue functionality going, but I'm getting
intermittent failures using this code:
///Bockarc.m
#import
lt;
Foundation/Foundation.h
gt;
#import
lt;
These things are largely obvious and useless, as talking about them is easier
than doing them...
Riccardo Mottola wrote:
As Philippe wrote: packaging is a non-rewarding, terrible job. Debian
Packages are already quite debatable due to packaging choices that were
imposed (the way they are
