On 2022-02-11 22:24:39 +0400 Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
Hi all.
After the improvements in navigation and design applied to
www.gnustep.org, I proceeded to slowly propagate them to the rest of
the
site. While I had no time to complete them, the major pages are now
almost up-to-spec.
Thank
Richard Frith-Macdonald writes:
> That's a *very* different thing from what the phrase 'dropping GCC
> support' suggests.
>
> There is no suggestion of rewriting all GNUstep code to require Clang;
> that would be silly.
That's a relief. Thanks for clarifying.
Hi all.
After the improvements in navigation and design applied to
www.gnustep.org, I proceeded to slowly propagate them to the rest of the
site. While I had no time to complete them, the major pages are now
almost up-to-spec.
GAP was already following a similar design, but is being upgraded.
> Am 11.02.2022 um 16:48 schrieb Umberto Cerrato :
>
>
>
>> Il giorno 11 feb 2022, alle ore 16:42, H. Nikolaus Schaller
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 11.02.2022 um 16:36 schrieb Umberto Cerrato :
>>>
>>> wow!
>>> could that mean it would be easier to install "gnustep"? (and program
wow!
could that mean it would be easier to install "gnustep"? (and program objc
programs?)
because I was actually asking: is there a more lightweight compiler than those
available?
by the way I am trying to figure out how to install gnustep...
u
> Il giorno 11 feb 2022, alle ore 16:29, H.
> Il giorno 11 feb 2022, alle ore 16:42, H. Nikolaus Schaller
> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>> Am 11.02.2022 um 16:36 schrieb Umberto Cerrato :
>>
>> wow!
>> could that mean it would be easier to install "gnustep"? (and program objc
>> programs?)
>> because I was actually asking: is there a more
> Am 11.02.2022 um 16:36 schrieb Umberto Cerrato :
>
> wow!
> could that mean it would be easier to install "gnustep"? (and program objc
> programs?)
> because I was actually asking: is there a more lightweight compiler than
> those available?
Hm. No. My proposal is to just extend standard
> On 11 Feb 2022, at 02:53, Po Lu wrote:
>
> Gregory Casamento writes:
>
>> The way I see it, we have two ways we can go. In each, I have outlined
>> what I believe needs to be done. It may or may not be complete:
>>
>> LLVM/Clang:
>> 1) Improve libobjc2 such that it can
>> a) function
> Am 08.02.2022 um 17:38 schrieb Gregory Casamento :
>
> The way I see it, we have two ways we can go.
Usually there is a third...
> In each, I have outlined what I believe needs to be done. It may or may not
> be complete:
> GCC
> 1) Implement syntactic sugar
>a) This includes @[],
Gregory Casamento writes:
> The way I see it, we have two ways we can go. In each, I have outlined
> what I believe needs to be done. It may or may not be complete:
>
> LLVM/Clang:
> 1) Improve libobjc2 such that it can
>a) function properly on a wider set of platforms. This means
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
