Riccardo,
Thanks for the response. I agree there is certainly a distinction between the
user types and I, as a developer myself, was referring to #2. However, I
disagree that catering to each group is equally important at this juncture for
two reasons:
1) GNUstep doesn’t currently have
Riccardo/Po,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 6:28 PM Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> Hi Po Lu,
>
>
> On 2022-02-11 02:53:07 + Po Lu wrote:
>
> > Before dropping GCC support in GNUstep, could you please consult with
> > the developers of other GNU software which uses GNUstep?
> >
> > I put quite some
Hi,
On 2022-02-10 02:31:44 + Gregory Casamento
wrote:
Riccardo,
I don't believe that GNUstep should hold back features to remain
compatible
with any given compiler. Not implementing features that are widely
used
(not even particularly "modern" ones) because the less capable
Hi,
On 2022-02-06 10:51:49 + Richard Frith-Macdonald
wrote:
I think general portability is an issue, not just MSYS.
MSYS is very sensitive itself - it took 2 years of work to upgrade
from the original "msys 1" setup with gcc 3.4 (all newer gcc's had
subtle issues!) to a failry
Hi Po Lu,
On 2022-02-11 02:53:07 + Po Lu wrote:
Before dropping GCC support in GNUstep, could you please consult with
the developers of other GNU software which uses GNUstep?
I put quite some effort into getting the GNUstep port of Emacs into a
presentable state, which I would not have
Hi Daniel,
I think unvoluntary you made a very important point, I don't know by being
aware of it or not.
> If you’re looking to recruit more GNUStep users, I just don’t think you
> can do that without ARC, @[], @{}, etc. There are plenty of ObjC developers
> out there right now who are
