Re: WebSite: navigation to bug reporting

2024-02-16 Thread Daniel Boyd
My vote is the "prominent place" option even though I admit it does detract somewhat from a clean aesthetic. But I think it's worth it. By having it in a prominent location, the most direct effect is that it will be easier to find. I don't think that matters as much for developers, most of whom

Re: WebSite: navigation to bug reporting

2024-02-16 Thread Fred Kiefer
I like the way you put it in the menu. The name „External“ is really a bit confusing, but at the moment I don’t have a better idea. Cheers, Fred > Am 16.02.2024 um 15:38 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > > Hi, > > I want to uniform the bug reporting on our website. > Originally, we had a single

WebSite: navigation to bug reporting

2024-02-16 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, I want to uniform the bug reporting on our website. Originally, we had a single page on savannah for all projects. I found this better than the current situation of github, were every sub-project has its own issue tracker. This makes reclassifying a bug impossible and also confuse

Re: Installing GNUstep from FreeBSD ports, again

2024-02-16 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
> On 16 Feb 2024, at 11:05, Sergei Golovin via Discussion list for the GNUstep > programming environment wrote: > > By the way it is strange that Gorm was installed in the > SYSTEM_DOMAIN. My installation goes into > <...>/Local/Applications/Gorm.app (that is LOCAL_DOMAIN). If this is the

Re: Installing GNUstep from FreeBSD ports, again

2024-02-16 Thread Sergei Golovin via Discussion list for the GNUstep programming environment
Edwin Ancaer writes: > Sergei, > > I have been booking at the defaults, but I find them in different places. > There is set of decent looking defaults file Defaults.plist at > /usr/local/GNUstep/System/Applications/Gorm.app/Resources. They are in > the attached file. It is shipped with Gorm