On 15-Feb-07, at 1:18 PM, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
Am 15.02.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Jeff Teunissen:
[snip]
Why, why WHY in the name of all that is good should anyone in a
Free Software
project act professional?
Because we want GNUstep to be successful? Because
In my opinion, it's a lousy attempt to become C# -- read: pandering
to MS developers, rather than taking care of its base. Bad strategy
in my opinion.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11-Feb-07, at 5:43 AM, Michael Hopkins wrote:
Why?
God I surely hope to hell
God I surely hope to hell not.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9-Feb-07, at 7:48 AM, Michael Hopkins wrote:
Hi all
Does anyone here know whether GNU/gcc/GNUstep are planning to track
the
syntax runtime changes coming in Apple's Objective-C 2.0? If so,
please
post info
Curious why nobody has written a Coroutine framework for Cocoa/
GNUstep. Coroutines would scale a lot better in this case.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3-Feb-07, at 3:44 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 3 Feb 2007, at 07:32, Tima wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make a client
contendors to a majority
government support the notion of updating the copyright law, just
whenever they do is another matter) which may change this
interpretation. So it's my opinion that the FSF's translation would
fly in Canada, but not in the USA. Keeping in mind that IANAL.
--
Jeremy
contendors to a majority
government support the notion of updating the copyright law, just
whenever they do is another matter) which may change this
interpretation. So it's my opinion that the FSF's translation would
fly in Canada, but not in the USA. Keeping in mind that IANAL.
--
Jeremy
with. Now it has a filemanager, which I don't like but exists.
Never underestimate consistency as a powerful element to overall
desktop enjoyment. Having to use third party tools with a different
look and feel degrades the overall experience in my opinion.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED
they
may not want to?
Thank you and sorry for being so long.
No worries. =]
--Tima
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
almost a waste to write a specification.--Jeremy Tregunna[EMAIL PROTECTED]"One serious obstacle to the adoption of good programming languages is the notion that everything has to be sacrificed for speed. In computer languages as in life, speed kills." -- M
closer to a stable release; but yes, caution should be taken, it's still rather rough.--Jeremy Tregunna[EMAIL PROTECTED]"The proof is the proof that the proof has been proven and that's the proof!" - Jean Chrétien ___
Discuss-gnustep mailing li
listDiscuss-gnustep@gnu.orghttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep!DSPAM:4473efbb21473608488397! --Jeremy Tregunna[EMAIL PROTECTED]"The proof is the proof that the proof has been proven and that's the proof!" - Jean Chrétien ___
Discu
place. (I mean no disrespect.)--Jeremy Tregunna[EMAIL PROTECTED]"The proof is the proof that the proof has been proven and thats the proof!" - Jean Chrétien ___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailma
On 13-Oct-05, at 10:18 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
Jeremy Tregunna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[private message posted to a mailing list]
First you send me a message off-list without a cc to the list,
(but also send a copy to list, unknown to me at that time) then
you post my reply to the off-list one
, and you won't be
distributing it, ergo no problem. God this list is terribly bad about
this kind of stuff, it's irritating.
Oh well, at least no-one suggested BitKeeper. ;-)
How about suggesting perfoce? =]
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If debugging is the process of removing bugs
On 12-Oct-05, at 5:47 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
Jeremy Tregunna,
Sure, but that doesn't affect the GNUstep distribution in any way
shape
or form, which was the whole debate in this thread.
I am a GNUstep committer who uses a GPL'd editor to control
CVS. How does it not affect GNUstep in any way
, .zip files don't preserve resource forks,
so you're back at square one. There is a tar like program (think it's
called xar or something similar) which does preserve resource forks.
Just a thought.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Discuss
nts, opening up her Applications directory to start an app, etc... (Though admittingly, I don't know your mother, so that's only a loose assumption.)
/rant>
Had fun?
J.
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-g
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
!DSPAM:421e6195764851285414339!
--
Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http
18 matches
Mail list logo
