On Monday, August 15, 2011 22:12 CEST, Riccardo Mottola
riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
to get back on this topic. Things look bright at the end of the tunnel,
so it would be nice to clean up some other small details before a shiny
new release.
1) locale / timezone on
On Monday, August 15, 2011 22:27 CEST, Richard Frith-Macdonald
rich...@tiptree.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 15 Aug 2011, at 21:12, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
to get back on this topic. Things look bright at the end of the tunnel, so
it would be nice to clean up some other small
Hi
How do you find the timezone on Free/Open BSD? What we need for timezone
support is some way to obtain, from the operating system, the correct timezone
name (eg. GB-Eire or Europe/Rome)
There's no standard way to do that, so we already have system-specific code to
get the info via the
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 09:01 CEST, Riccardo Mottola
riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Hi
How do you find the timezone on Free/Open BSD? What we need for timezone
support is some way to obtain, from the operating system, the correct
timezone name (eg. GB-Eire or Europe/Rome)
Hi
*light bulb on* ! Perhaps we do not read the conent, but we assume it
is a symlink? I tried switching versions using a symlink and not by
copying again I need to test that too. Darn.
I confirm this.
It is not a matter if localtime is of version 1 or 2: if it is a raw
copy, it
On 16 Aug 2011, at 08:32, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi
*light bulb on* ! Perhaps we do not read the conent, but we assume it is a
symlink? I tried switching versions using a symlink and not by copying
again I need to test that too. Darn.
I confirm this.
It is not a matter if
On 16 Aug 2011, at 07:37, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
OpenBSD sparc was switched to gcc-4.2 some weeks ago.
OpenBSD SPARC was, as far as I know, the last platform we supported that used
GCC 2.95. Does this mean that we can finally require GCC 3 or later and switch
to C99 mode?
David
--
Hi,
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 11:15 CEST, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org
wrote:
On 16 Aug 2011, at 07:37, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
OpenBSD sparc was switched to gcc-4.2 some weeks ago.
OpenBSD SPARC was, as far as I know, the last platform we supported that used
GCC 2.95.
Hi,
to get back on this topic. Things look bright at the end of the tunnel,
so it would be nice to clean up some other small details before a shiny
new release.
1) locale / timezone on OpenBSD and FreeBSD.
[NSTimeZone systemTimeZone]
needs to return something sensible... (or all apps will
On 15 Aug 2011, at 21:12, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
to get back on this topic. Things look bright at the end of the tunnel, so it
would be nice to clean up some other small details before a shiny new release.
1) locale / timezone on OpenBSD and FreeBSD.
[NSTimeZone systemTimeZone]
On 15 Aug 2011, at 21:27, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 15 Aug 2011, at 21:12, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
2) cygwin tmp files directory as shown in my tests
3) cygwin bundle support, at least with our own libobjc 1.6 (since it works
with mingw, it should for cygwin too)
I would
On 2 Aug 2011, at 09:44, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Hi David,
you don't seem to get the point. I don't have to tell you that a change the
contains the word fix is just as likely to break something as if it doesn't
contain that word.
And even if these fixes where 100% correct, we still need to
On 2 Aug 2011, at 19:02, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
And nowadays we really need to test builds with clang, new runtime, and with
the latest gcc and the new gcc runtime, and we have two new GC variants ...
I regularly run the test suite with FreeBSD/x86-32 and Linux/x86-64, both with
the
Hi David,
you don't seem to get the point. I don't have to tell you that a change
the contains the word fix is just as likely to break something as if
it doesn't contain that word.
And even if these fixes where 100% correct, we still need to make sure
that none of the other changes has any
On 2 Aug 2011, at 09:44, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Hi David,
you don't seem to get the point. I don't have to tell you that a change the
contains the word fix is just as likely to break something as if it doesn't
contain that word.
And even if these fixes where 100% correct, we still need to
Hello all of the people,
What do you think about the idea of doing a new point release of -base soon?
Most of the changes I've made in -base since the last release have been bug
fixes and cleanups - and looking at the commit logs, I'm far from being the
only person to do this - so trunk is
On 01.08.2011 16:59, David Chisnall wrote:
What do you think about the idea of doing a new point release of -base soon?
Most of the changes I've made in -base since the last release have been bug
fixes and cleanups - and looking at the commit logs, I'm far from being the
only person to do
On 1 Aug 2011, at 16:27, Fred Kiefer wrote:
we also should get rid of the compiler warnings from NSRegularExpression and
NSThread
I get no warnings at all from base - what do you get in NSRegularExpression?
And did you try removing the @ from the string in the assert() in NSThread (and
Hi,
you added great stuff, but I think it should settle a bit... Just to
ensure that base is not causing things to be crashy and/or less portable.
Riccardo
David Chisnall wrote:
Hello all of the people,
What do you think about the idea of doing a new point release of -base soon?
Most of
Well, looking through the change log, about 90% of the changes since the last
release have contained the word 'fix'. A lot of the changes I made were fixes
because PyObjC discovered bugs in GNUstep. I'd like to tighten up some of the
ARC-related stuff, but I'm not too bothered about the
20 matches
Mail list logo
