Le 16.12.2022 00:08, Riccardo Mottola a écrit :
1) simplicity of maintaining a static website [*]: it is just easy to
develop it locally, test it... no need for a webserver. This is how I
maintain(ed) the GS website until its current fate. Very convenient
and always available "on the go" where I
Dave,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 3:27 PM David Wetzel wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I think that would be a good idea. What we would need for a site that gets
> lots of hits is probably some optimizing of the apache module.
> We are currently opening/closing a new socket on each request.
>
> If you
Hey guys,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 4:28 AM Richard Frith-Macdonald <
rich...@frithmacdonald.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
> > On 15 Dec 2022, at 23:08, Riccardo Mottola
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Gregory Casamento wrote:
> >> Do you think we should have part of the website use WebObjects/GSWeb as
> a
> On 15 Dec 2022, at 23:08, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Gregory Casamento wrote:
>> Do you think we should have part of the website use WebObjects/GSWeb as a
>> sort of demo of GNUstep itself?
>
> as cool as it may sound and as nice it is to "eat your own dogfood" is, two
>
I think subdomains is what Sugar Labs do: they offer little sub-site for trying
their environment live and the link to it is at the home page.
https://www.sugarlabs.org/ Home page
https://try.sugarizer.org/ Live environment to try
Hi,
Gregory Casamento wrote:
Do you think we should have part of the website use WebObjects/GSWeb
as a sort of demo of GNUstep itself?
as cool as it may sound and as nice it is to "eat your own dogfood" is,
two reasons come up to my mind of why not
1) simplicity of maintaining a static
Hi Everyone,
I think that would be a good idea. What we would need for a site that gets lots
of hits is probably some optimizing of the apache module.
We are currently opening/closing a new socket on each request.
If you need anything I might be able to help in the next 30 days. From
>
>
> Do you think we should have part of the website use WebObjects/GSWeb as a
> sort of demo of GNUstep itself?
>
It would be great, BTW i wonder whether the website's source is hosted
somewhere as a public code repo.
>
Guys,
Do you think we should have part of the website use WebObjects/GSWeb as a
sort of demo of GNUstep itself?
I have recently been playing with it locally and it has me wondering if
that might be a viable thing for us to do.
Just a thought. Carry on. :)
GC
--
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead